Skip to content
Sign in
Finance & Markets · Middle East

Israel extradites Alexander Block to the U.S. over alleged Nomad theft

Israel extradited Alexander Block to the United States, where he faces charges over an alleged $2.8 million theft from Nomad Bridge in 2022. TokenPost says the alleged theft was followed by withdrawals of more than $186 million from project-controlled wallets.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 1 of 5 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 6 entries
5 outletsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Mostly CenterL 0 · C 2 · R 1 · 2 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Israel
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • The alleged theft at issue in the U.S. case involved $2.8 million (per tokenpost.com, The Jerusalem Post, jfeed.com).
  • The case concerns an alleged theft from Nomad Bridge in 2022 (per tokenpost.com).
  • TokenPost says other users later withdrew more than $186 million from wallets controlled by Nomad (per tokenpost.com, calcalistech.com).
  • Israel's Supreme Court rejected Block's challenge to extradition (per tokenpost.com).
  • Chief Justice Isaac Amit denied Block's request for another hearing (per tokenpost.com).
  • Israel's Supreme Court said exploiting a software flaw may qualify as unlawful computer access even if the software permits the operation (per tokenpost.com).

The brief

Israel extradited Alexander Block to the United States, where he faces charges over an alleged $2.8 million theft from Nomad Bridge. TokenPost reported that the U.S. case concerns an alleged theft in 2022, followed by withdrawals exceeding $186 million from wallets controlled by the project.

The larger amount refers to what other users later withdrew, not the sum of the alleged theft attributed to Block. According to TokenPost, prosecutors describe six test transfers and four larger transactions in the U.S. case. Prosecutors allege that Block’s actions exposed a weakness in Nomad’s smart contract.

The account characterizes the initial incident as one alleged theft and distinguishes it from the subsequent withdrawals by other users. Israel’s Supreme Court rejected Block’s challenge to extradition. In discussing the legal issue, the court said exploiting a software flaw could amount to unlawful computer access even when the software allows the operation.

That statement describes the court’s view of the legal question; it is not a finding in the account that Block committed the alleged theft. TokenPost also reported that Chief Justice Isaac Amit denied Block’s request for another hearing.

The account does not provide the dates of the extradition, the court’s rejection of Block’s challenge, or the denial of his request, so their sequence beyond the described extradition proceedings is not specified here. The case now concerns allegations brought in the United States, while the extradition challenge and request for another hearing were addressed in Israel.

The reported figures distinguish the alleged $2.8 million theft from the more than $186 million that TokenPost says other users later withdrew from project-controlled wallets. The available account does not state Block’s plea, the specific charges, or the next court date.

It reports the prosecution’s allegations and the Israeli court decisions, but does not report a conviction or admission by Block.

Why it matters

  • The reported financial stakes have two distinct figures: prosecutors allege a $2.8 million theft by Block, while TokenPost says other users later withdrew more than $186 million from Nomad-controlled wallets.
  • The alleged weakness in Nomad’s smart contract is central to prosecutors’ account of how the alleged theft occurred.
  • The extradition moves the U.S. case forward after Israel’s Supreme Court rejected Block’s challenge and Chief Justice Isaac Amit denied a further-hearing request.

What to watch next

  • Whether U.S. prosecutors proceed with the allegations concerning the six test transfers and four larger transactions.
  • Whether the U.S. case addresses the alleged $2.8 million theft separately from the later withdrawals exceeding $186 million.
  • Whether further proceedings in the United States establish Block’s plea, the specific charges, or a court date.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Mostly Center· 2 Center · 1 Right · 2 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Unknown 60% · Middle East 40%
Outlet political mix
Mostly Center
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
2 outlets
1 outlet
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 2 unrated outlets are not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: Middle East
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Israel enacted its Extradition Law, establishing the country’s domestic process for considering extradition requests.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. The United States and Israel signed an extradition treaty.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. The United States–Israel extradition treaty entered into force.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. The United States enacted the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in 1986, making certain forms of unauthorized access to computers a federal crime.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. Those rulings formed the immediate legal backdrop to the U.S. case over an alleged $2.8 million theft from Nomad in 2022.
    Background · from our historical context
  6. On August 1, 2022, an exploit of the bridge’s software enabled unauthorized withdrawals.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

Before the transfer, Israel’s Supreme Court rejected Alexander Block’s challenge to extradition, and Chief Justice Isaac Amit denied his request for an additional hearing; the court also addressed whether exploiting a software flaw could constitute unlawful computer access even when the software allowed the operation.

Those rulings formed the immediate legal backdrop to the U.S. case over an alleged $2.8 million theft from Nomad in 2022. On August 1, 2022, an exploit of the bridge’s software enabled unauthorized withdrawals. Other users then copied the exploit and withdrew funds from wallets controlled by Nomad; accounts of the incident put those later withdrawals at more than $186 million.

Original sources

2 of 5 articles · Middle East · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.