Skip to content
↑Part of: Trump waives Russia measures as Moscow agrees to diesel shipments
Geopolitics · Europe

Trump waives Russia sanctions, tariffs after U.S. diesel deal draws backlash

Donald Trump signed an executive order waiving sanctions and tariffs under the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act. The Washington Examiner said the move followed Trump’s announcement of a U.S. deal to buy Russian diesel and drew bipartisan concern that the deal undermined Ukraine.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Full text read from 1 of 5 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 4 entries
5 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 4 min read
Coverage: MixedL 0 · C 2 · R 3
File photo
Photo: Daniel Torok / Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • Donald Trump signed an executive order waiving sanctions and tariffs under the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act (per Washington Examiner, aol.com, The Jerusalem Post).
  • Trump said he submitted a written certification to Congress explaining why he considered the waiver to be in the U.S. national interest (per Washington Examiner).
  • Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act into law last month (per Washington Examiner).
  • Trump announced a U.S. deal to purchase Russian diesel one week before signing the waiver order (per Washington Examiner).
  • Trump said the U.S. diesel purchase aimed to lower global energy prices before the midterm elections (per Washington Examiner).
  • The diesel deal drew bipartisan concern that the United States was undermining Ukraine in its war with Russia (per Washington Examiner).
  • The Washington Examiner quoted Warren saying Trump had not used his existing sanctions authority to disrupt support for Russia’s war effort or help achieve what Warren called a just peace for Ukraine (per Washington Examiner).

The brief

Donald Trump signed an executive order waiving sanctions and tariffs under the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act, the Washington Examiner reported. Trump said he had sent Congress a written certification explaining why he viewed the waiver as serving U.S. national interests.

Headlines from The Jerusalem Post, Fox Business, AOL and Bloomberg also described Trump’s waiver, with their wording variously referring to sanctions, tariffs, restrictions or duties. The executive order concerns legislation Trump signed into law last month. The Washington Examiner reported that the act was championed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham.

The order’s stated legal basis, as quoted by the Examiner, requires a written certification to Congress for a waiver. The outlet’s account does not provide the certification’s full text or further details of its contents beyond Trump’s stated explanation. The waiver followed Trump’s announcement of a U.S. agreement to purchase Russian diesel one week earlier.

Trump said the purchase was intended to lower global energy prices before the midterm elections. The Washington Examiner reported that the diesel deal prompted bipartisan concern among lawmakers that the United States was undermining Ukraine in its war with Russia. The Examiner also quoted Warren criticizing Trump’s use of sanctions authority.

Warren said Trump had not used his existing authority to disrupt support for Russia’s war effort or to help achieve what Warren described as a just peace for Ukraine. That is Warren’s assessment, as reported by the outlet; the account does not give a response from Trump to that criticism.

The order and the diesel deal are distinct actions in the Examiner’s account: the U.S. purchase announcement preceded the sanctions waiver by one week. Trump’s stated rationale for the purchase was energy prices, while his stated justification for the waiver was the U.S. national interest.

The account does not establish that the diesel deal caused the waiver, though it reports the lawmakers’ concerns about the deal and the timing of the order. The article says the act was championed by Graham and reports that Trump signed it into law last month.

Its account also quotes a provision describing a written certification to Congress as a condition for waiving sanctions provisions, restrictions or duties under the act. The outlet reports that Trump submitted such a certification, but the executive order’s full reasoning is not detailed in the article.

The documented next point is Congress’s receipt of Trump’s written certification and the questions lawmakers raised about the diesel deal. The Washington Examiner’s account does not specify any further congressional action or provide a response from the lawmakers who expressed concern.

Why it matters

  • The U.S. government’s waiver concerns sanctions and tariffs under the Graham Act, while lawmakers’ stated concern was that the Russian diesel deal undermined Ukraine in its war with Russia.
  • Trump said the U.S. diesel purchase was intended to lower global energy prices before the midterm elections.
  • Warren’s criticism focused on the use of existing sanctions authority to disrupt support for Russia’s war effort and advance what Warren called a just peace for Ukraine.

What to watch next

  • Whether Congress responds to the written certification Trump said he submitted concerning the waiver.
  • Whether lawmakers who raised concerns about the Russian diesel deal take further action.
  • Whether the U.S. diesel purchase proceeds as Trump announced.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Coverage mix: Mixed· 2 Center · 3 Right
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 60% · Middle East 20% · Other 20%
Coverage mix
Mixed
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
2 outlets
3 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
How we measure coverage

One source is from a wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP or Bloomberg), whose reporting other outlets often republish.

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. The modern sanctions framework took shape after Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014 and backed armed separatists in eastern Ukraine.
    Background · from our historical context
  2. Ukraine and most governments rejected the annexation as unlawful, and the United Nations General Assembly affirmed Ukraine’s territorial integrity in Resolution 68/262 on March 27, 2014.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. Congress codified and expanded sanctions authorities in the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, signed by President Donald Trump on August 2, 2017.
    Background · from our historical context
  4. On March 8, 2022, President Joe Biden signed Executive Order 14066, barring U.S. imports of Russian oil and certain other energy products.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

Before the 2026 sanctions dispute, the United States had already built a system of restrictions aimed at limiting Russia’s access to finance, energy revenue and trade. The immediate legislative backdrop was the enactment of the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act in 2026, which gave the president authority to waive sanctions and tariffs under specified conditions.

A separate, earlier U.S. agreement to purchase Russian diesel also put energy trade with Russia at the center of debate; critics argued that such purchases could weaken support for Ukraine. The modern sanctions framework took shape after Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014 and backed armed separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Related developments1 story

Original sources

1 of 5 articles · Middle East · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.