Skip to content
Sign in
Technology · Europe

Regulators in New York and London intensify scrutiny of banks' use of advanced AI, report says

Banking regulators in New York and London are increasing scrutiny of banks' use of advanced artificial intelligence, according to The Japan Times. The scrutiny focuses on risks including cyberattacks and rogue AI agents and has prompted U.S. supervisors including the Federal Reserve to question banks about their use of advanced AI models.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Full text read from 1 of 5 outletsHow it's made

5 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Too few ratedL 0 · C 2 · R 0 · 3 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Federal Reserve
Updat3 graphic

What happened

Key facts

  • Banking regulators in New York and London are stepping up efforts to contain growing artificial intelligence risks (per The Japan Times).
  • The heightened scrutiny highlights concerns about cyberattacks on banks and rogue AI agents that could undermine global financial stability (per The Japan Times, Yahoo, magzter.com).
  • Six people familiar with the matter told The Japan Times that regulators are ramping up their scrutiny of artificial intelligence (per The Japan Times).
  • Three top U.S. regulators, including the Federal Reserve, are quizzing banks about their use of advanced artificial intelligence models, two of the people told The Japan Times (per The Japan Times).
  • Regulators said advances in frontier AI may require costly investments in cyberrecovery (per The Japan Times).
  • Regulators are paying greater attention to banks' dependencies on external technology providers, according to The Japan Times (per The Japan Times).
  • In some jurisdictions, the increased scrutiny could prompt more formal regulatory guidance, sources told The Japan Times (per The Japan Times).
  • Yahoo's headline frames regulators as 'growing increasingly worried' that rogue AI could threaten the global banking system (per Yahoo).
  • Other outlets' headlines report that banking watchdogs have ramped up AI scrutiny as stability concerns rise (per magzter.com, newskarnataka.com, arise.tv).

The brief

Banking authorities in New York and London have increased scrutiny of banks' use of advanced artificial intelligence, The Japan Times reported. Six people familiar with the matter told the paper that supervisors are now focusing on how frontier AI systems could create new channels for cyberattacks or produce autonomous 'rogue' agents whose actions threaten the stability of financial institutions. The Japan Times said the scrutiny has translated into concrete supervisory activity in the United States, where three leading regulators — including the Federal Reserve — have been questioning banks about their use of advanced AI models. Two of the people cited by the paper described that outreach as an expansion of prior oversight rather than a one-off inquiry. According to the report, regulators cited a cluster of operational concerns: the potential need for substantial investments in cyberrecovery, increased scrutiny of banks' reliance on outside technology vendors, and the possibility that advances at the frontier of AI will change the risk profile of large financial firms. The paper quotes unnamed sources who linked those technical and supply-chain dependencies to the new supervisory focus. The Japan Times also reported that in some jurisdictions the stepped-up attention could evolve into more formal guidance from supervisors, although the paper did not identify specific regulatory texts or timelines. Headlines from other outlets reflected the same central development: Yahoo framed the issue as regulators being 'growing increasingly worried' that rogue AI could threaten the global banking system, and other headlines said banking watchdogs have 'ramp[ed] up AI scrutiny as stability concerns rise.'

The reporting does not provide figures for losses, breaches, or model deployments, nor does it name the specific banks under scrutiny. The Japan Times limited its sourcing to six people it said were familiar with the matter and to two people who described U.S. supervisory questioning, and it did not publish regulator statements, bank responses, or formal guidance texts. Regulators' focus, as described by The Japan Times, centres on preventing AI-driven cyber incidents and on ensuring banks can finance and execute recovery from sophisticated attacks. Whether that supervisory attention will produce new rules, public guidance or enforcement actions in specific jurisdictions was not detailed in the report.

Why it matters

  • Banks that depend on external technology vendors could face concrete costs for enhanced cyberrecovery measures, because The Japan Times reports regulators expect costly investments in cyberrecovery.
  • Customers of large banks bear operational risk if AI-enabled cyberattacks occur, because the report links frontier AI advances to new cyberattack vectors on banks.
  • Regulators and supervisors, including the Federal Reserve, have signalled they may escalate oversight into formal guidance, which could change banks' compliance obligations and operational practices.

What to watch next

  • Whether regulators in specific jurisdictions issue formal guidance on banks' use of advanced AI, as The Japan Times said could occur.
  • Whether the Federal Reserve and the two other U.S. supervisors that have been quizzing banks publish findings or follow-up supervisory letters after their inquiries.
  • Whether banks disclose increased spending on cyberrecovery or changes to vendor contracts in regulatory filings following the heightened scrutiny.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Coverage mix: Too few rated· 2 Center
Where the outlets are based: Unknown 60% · US/Canada 20% · Other 20%
Coverage mix
Too few rated
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
2 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 3 unrated outlets are not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
How we measure coverage

One source is from a wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP or Bloomberg), whose reporting other outlets often republish.

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

How we got here

The immediate backdrop was President Joe Biden’s executive order on safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence, signed on Oct. 30, 2023, which directed federal agencies to assess and mitigate AI risks.

Structurally, the EU’s April 21, 2021 proposal for the Artificial Intelligence Act set a regional regulatory framework for high‑risk AI systems, and the UK hosted the AI Safety Summit on Nov. 1–2, 2023 to coordinate international AI safety work.

Original sources

1 of 5 articles · Asia · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.