Cuban ambassador urges Canada to maintain opposition to U.S. embargo
Cuba’s ambassador urged Canada to keep opposing the U.S. embargo, which the UN General Assembly has repeatedly called on Washington to end.
AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 3 independent reports from 7 outlets · Article text read from 1 of 3 reports · 1 article captured only in partHow it's made
View timeline · 7 entriesWhat happened
Key facts
- Cuban ambassadors asked Canada to renew its opposition to the U.S. embargo and fuel blockade.
- Canada has voted in favour of the motion multiple times.
- The United Nations is set to vote next week on a motion Cuba has put forward nearly every year since 1992.
The brief
Cuban Ambassador to Canada Rodrigo Malmierca Diaz urged Ottawa to keep publicly opposing the U.S. embargo and fuel blockade, as the United Nations prepares to vote on a Cuban motion. Malmierca Diaz told The Canadian Press that Cuba was confident Canada would continue to support it as it had in the past.
The request places Canada’s established voting position at the centre of the upcoming vote. The United Nations is set to consider the motion next week. Cuba has introduced it nearly every year since 1992, and Canada has voted in its favour multiple times. The motion’s wording and the precise timing of the vote were not stated in the report.
The U.S. position was presented by U.S. Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz, who urged countries to oppose the motion. At a Monday event he hosted, Waltz described it as a product of “70 years of propaganda” and said it was intended to divert attention from corruption in Havana.
His remarks set out a competing rationale for how countries should vote; the report does not provide a response from the Cuban government to that characterization. The appeal comes as Cuba faces an economic crisis that the report says has continued since 2020. It describes critical shortages and severe blackouts, with the blackouts peaking after January’s fuel blockade.
The report also says Cuba produces 40 per cent of the fuel it needs, linking the fuel shortfall to the context in which Cuban representatives are seeking continued Canadian opposition to the U.S. measures. Ottawa has pledged $13 million in humanitarian aid for Cubans. The funds are to be distributed through international organizations rather than the Cuban government.
That arrangement is distinct from Canada’s position on the UN motion: the aid commitment concerns assistance to Cubans, while the vote concerns the motion Cuba has repeatedly brought before the United Nations. The immediate decisions to follow are Canada’s vote and the positions other countries take on the motion.
Waltz’s public appeal calls for a vote against it, while Malmierca Diaz is asking Canada not to abandon its previous support. The account does not give a final vote result or state how Canada will vote this time.
Why it matters
- Canada’s vote would reinforce its longstanding diplomatic opposition to the U.S. embargo, while a shift in position could weaken that signal ahead of the UN vote. The dispute also puts Ottawa between Washington, which is urging countries to reject Cuba’s motion, and Havana, which is seeking continued Canadian support.
What to watch next
- Whether Canada votes in favour of the Cuban motion at the United Nations.
- Whether countries follow Mike Waltz’s call to vote against the motion.
- The United Nations vote on the motion Cuba has introduced nearly every year since 1992.
How it's being covered
Coverage analysisShow details7 source articles · 7 unique outlets · 3 distinct reportsOutlet political mix: Center Only· 5 Center · 2 unratedWhere the outlets are based: Unknown 57% · US/Canada 43%
- Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (5 of 5 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How outlets' accounts compare
Timeline
Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.- The U.S. embargo developed through measures taken after Fidel Castro’s government came to power in 1959 and nationalized U.S.-owned property.Background · from our historical context
- On October 19, 1960, the Eisenhower administration imposed a broad export embargo on Cuba, while retaining exceptions for food and medicine.Background · from our historical context
- President John F. Kennedy expanded the U.S. embargo on Cuba.Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
- The General Assembly first adopted a resolution on the U.S. embargo in 1992, when it called for countries to refrain from imposing measures that restricted Cuba’s trade and navigation.Background · from our historical context
- In 1996, Canada amended its Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act to counter the effects of U.S. legislation that sought to penalize foreign companies doing business with Cuba.Background · from our historical context
- The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act, signed by President Bill Clinton on March 12, 1996, codified the embargo and included provisions allowing lawsuits over property confiscated by Cuba.Background · from our historical context
- On October 30, 2024, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Cuba’s annual resolution calling for an end to the U.S. embargo by 187 votes to 2, with one abstention.Background · from our historical context
How we got here
On October 30, 2024, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Cuba’s annual resolution calling for an end to the U.S. embargo by 187 votes to 2, with one abstention. The General Assembly first adopted a resolution on the U.S. embargo in 1992, when it called for countries to refrain from imposing measures that restricted Cuba’s trade and navigation.
In 1996, Canada amended its Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act to counter the effects of U.S. legislation that sought to penalize foreign companies doing business with Cuba. The U.S. embargo developed through measures taken after Fidel Castro’s government came to power in 1959 and nationalized U.S.-owned property.
Original sources
3 of 7 articles · US/Canada · Show allEvery story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources
Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.