Skip to content
Sign in
Politics · North America

Crypto groups spend $176 million across more than 100 midterm races

Crypto political groups spent roughly $176 million across more than 100 U.S. midterm races to build support for digital-asset legislation. Fairshake and affiliated committees accounted for about $150.8 million, and Fairshake said 53 of 58 candidates it backed won.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 3 independent reports from 4 outlets · Article text read from 2 of 3 reports · 1 article captured only in partHow it's made

View timeline · 8 entries
4 outletsLatest reporting 4 min read
Coverage: Too few ratedL 0 · C 0 · R 2 · 2 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Politics
Updat3 graphic

What happened

Key facts

  • Fairshake has committed $30 million to oppose Sherrod Brown in Ohio’s 2026 Senate race.
  • The cryptocurrency industry has spent more on Ohio’s Senate election than on any other Senate election in the nation.
  • David McIntosh said the crypto sector opposed Brown over his position on the Senate banking committee and his support for Elizabeth Warren’s effort concerning cryptocurrency.
  • Brown lost to Bernie Moreno in 2024 by nearly a four-point margin.
  • Brown is running again for Senate against incumbent Jon Husted.
  • Fairshake reported that 53 of the 58 candidates it supported in primaries and special elections won.
  • Fairshake spokesperson Geoff Vetter said the group backs candidates who support American financial innovation across both parties.

The brief

Fairshake committed $30 million to oppose Sherrod Brown in Ohio’s 2026 Senate race, putting the crypto super PAC back into a contest it heavily funded against Brown in 2024. Brown is challenging incumbent Sen. Jon Husted. The Washington Examiner reported that the cryptocurrency industry has spent more on Ohio’s Senate election than on any other Senate race in the nation.

The Washington Examiner described Fairshake’s 2024 spending against Brown as helping defeat him. Brown lost to Sen. Bernie Moreno by nearly four percentage points that year. The outlet says Fairshake has committed $40 million in spending against Brown in 2024; its account does not specify how that amount compares with the newly reported $30 million commitment.

David McIntosh, president of the conservative Club for Growth and a co-founder of the Federalist Society, told the Washington Examiner that crypto interests opposed Brown because of his position on the banking committee. McIntosh also tied that opposition to Brown’s support for an effort by Sen.

Elizabeth Warren that he characterized as seeking to eliminate cryptocurrency in the United States. That description is McIntosh’s characterization of the effort, rather than an independently established account of its purpose. A broader election-spending figure provides context for the commitment.

Crypto.news reported that crypto political groups had spent about $176 million across more than 100 congressional races ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.

It attributed $150.8 million in spending through October 20 to Fairshake and affiliated political action committees, citing a Reuters investigation, and said other crypto-backed groups had contributed roughly $25 million. The two outlets emphasize different scales of the political spending.

The Washington Examiner centers Ohio and the history of Fairshake’s spending against Brown; crypto.news reports totals across congressional races and describes the industry’s effort as aimed at building support for digital-asset legislation that could continue beyond President Donald Trump’s administration.

Bitcoin Magazine’s headline also reports the $176 million total and says the industry is building for the next Congress. Brown’s earlier criticism of the industry adds context to the political dispute. In 2023, he criticized what he called a lack of transparency in crypto and called on the Biden administration to seek more disclosure.

The sources connect McIntosh’s explanation of crypto interests’ opposition to Brown with the senator’s banking committee position and support for Warren’s effort, but do not provide Brown’s account of the new commitment or Husted’s response.

The reporting documents a new $30 million commitment, a prior campaign against Brown, and large-scale crypto political spending across other races. It does not specify how Fairshake will spend the new commitment or identify particular advertisements, expenditures, or campaign activities tied to it.

Why it matters

  • Brown’s campaign faces a $30 million commitment from Fairshake to oppose him, while he runs against incumbent Sen. Jon Husted.
  • Ohio voters are the specific electorate at stake in a Senate contest that the Washington Examiner says has drawn more cryptocurrency-industry spending than any other Senate race.
  • Crypto political groups spent about $176 million across more than 100 congressional races; crypto.news says the spending is intended to build support for digital-asset legislation that could outlast President Donald Trump’s administration.
  • McIntosh links crypto interests’ opposition to Brown with his banking committee position and his support for Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s effort; Brown’s separate criticism focused on industry transparency and disclosure.

What to watch next

  • Whether Fairshake directs any identifiable spending or campaign activity toward opposing Brown in Ohio.
  • How Brown and incumbent Sen. Jon Husted campaign against each other in the 2026 Ohio Senate race.
  • Whether the crypto political groups’ spending across more than 100 congressional races is accompanied by support for digital-asset legislation, the stated objective described by crypto.news.
  • Whether Brown or Husted publicly addresses Fairshake’s $30 million commitment.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
4 source articles · 4 unique outlets · 3 distinct reports
Outlet political mix: Too few rated· 2 Right · 2 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Unknown 75% · US/Canada 25%
Outlet political mix
Too few rated
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
0 outlets
2 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 2 unrated outlets are not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
4 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among outlets based in Unknown (3 of 4 geographically-identified sources).
How we measure coverage

One source is from a wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP or Bloomberg), whose reporting other outlets often republish.

How outlets' accounts compare

3 framing differences · 2 uncorroborated claims · 3 information gaps
The reports repeat the same account with different emphasis; its central claims are not independently confirmed in the reporting Updat3 read.Compared across 2 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 1 other outlet was checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • The Washington Examiner focuses on Fairshake’s spending against Brown and Ohio’s place as the Senate race with the most cryptocurrency-industry spending; crypto.news focuses on roughly $176 million in crypto political spending across more than 100 congressional races and its stated legislative aim.
  • Bitcoin Magazine’s headline corroborates the $176 million figure and frames the spending as preparation for the next Congress.
  • McIntosh attributed crypto interests’ opposition to Brown to his banking committee position and support for an effort by Sen. Elizabeth Warren; the characterization of that effort as seeking to eliminate cryptocurrency is McIntosh’s.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • McIntosh characterized Warren’s effort as seeking to eliminate cryptocurrency in the United States.
  • The Washington Examiner said Fairshake’s 2024 spending against Brown helped defeat him.
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The sources do not identify the specific advertisements, expenditures, or campaign activities that will make up Fairshake’s $30 million commitment.
  • The sources do not provide Brown’s account of the new commitment or Husted’s response.
  • The sources do not establish how Fairshake will spend its $30 million commitment or identify campaign activities funded by it.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Sherrod Brown won election to the U.S. Senate from Ohio.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. In *Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission*, decided January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court held that the government could not restrict independent political spending by corporations and unions.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. In *SpeechNow.org v. FEC*, decided March 26, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that groups making only independent expenditures could accept unlimited contributions.
    Background · from our historical context
  4. Sherrod Brown won reelection to the U.S. Senate from Ohio.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  5. Sherrod Brown became chair of the Senate Banking Committee.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  6. A further backdrop was the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX in November 2022, which intensified congressional scrutiny of the industry.
    Background · from our historical context
  7. Elizabeth Warren introduced the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  8. In November 2024, Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown lost to Republican Bernie Moreno by nearly four percentage points.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

In November 2024, Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown lost to Republican Bernie Moreno by nearly four percentage points. The Washington Examiner later reported that Fairshake’s spending against Brown helped defeat him; Brown had chaired the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees financial regulation, and had criticized the cryptocurrency industry’s transparency in 2023.

Brown called on the Biden administration that year to seek greater disclosure from crypto companies. Fairshake’s opposition to Brown therefore followed a dispute over both his committee role and his positions on cryptocurrency. The committee’s crypto-related work also included legislation sponsored by Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Original sources

1 of 4 articles · US/Canada · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.