Skip to content
Sign in
Business · Asia Pacific

Federal Court orders Star to pay $260 million over compliance breaches

The Federal Court ordered Star Entertainment to pay a $260 million fine after finding it breached anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws. Justice Cameron Moore said remediation and overlapping earlier penalties reduced the fine, while Star had argued that paying more than $100 million would be challenging.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 1 of 5 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 5 entries
5 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 2 min read
Coverage: Center OnlyL 0 · C 5 · R 0

What happened

Key facts

  • The Federal Court ordered Star to pay $260 million in penalties (per The Sydney Morning Herald, asgam.com).
  • Star was fined over money-laundering violations in Australia (per The Sydney Morning Herald, tradersunion.com, asgam.com).
  • The court found that Star breached anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws (per The Sydney Morning Herald).
  • Justice Cameron Moore said Star put profit ahead of compliance on a large scale (per The Sydney Morning Herald).
  • Austrac argued that a $400 million penalty would be appropriate (per The Sydney Morning Herald).
  • Star argued that a penalty above $100 million would be challenging to pay using available liquidity options, including access to equity markets (per The Sydney Morning Herald).
  • Moore said Star may need to raise money to pay the penalty (per The Sydney Morning Herald).
  • The Sydney Morning Herald reported that a rescue deal from Bally’s Corporation chairman Soo Kim had kept Star afloat (per The Sydney Morning Herald).

The brief

The Federal Court ordered Star Entertainment to pay $260 million after finding that the casino operator breached anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws. The Sydney Morning Herald reported that Justice Cameron Moore said Star had put profit ahead of compliance on a large scale.

The order imposes a substantial penalty on the company, while the judge’s comments and Star’s arguments put its capacity to pay in focus. Moore reduced the fine, citing Star’s remediation and earlier penalties for conduct that significantly overlapped with the case, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.

The reduction reflects those factors in the court’s penalty decision; the article does not describe the remediation measures or give the amounts of the earlier penalties. The regulator, Austrac, argued in court that a $400 million penalty would be appropriate.

Star, by contrast, argued that a penalty greater than $100 million would be difficult to pay using its available liquidity options. Those options included accessing equity markets, The Sydney Morning Herald reported. The court’s $260 million order is above the threshold Star said would be challenging. Moore said Star may need to raise money to pay the penalty.

That prospect follows from the judge’s stated assessment; the account does not say whether Star has decided how it would fund payment. The Sydney Morning Herald also reported that a rescue deal from Bally’s Corporation chairman Soo Kim had kept the company afloat, placing the penalty against a backdrop of financial support without specifying the deal’s terms.

The ruling concerns Star’s compliance with anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws. The Sydney Morning Herald reported that the court considered remediation and overlapping penalties when setting the amount, while Austrac’s proposed figure was higher and Star had argued that a much lower threshold would strain its available liquidity.

The available account does not state when payment is due or whether Star plans to appeal.

Why it matters

  • Star faces a $260 million penalty, a concrete cost for the casino operator; Moore said it may need to raise money to pay.
  • Star said paying more than $100 million would be challenging using available liquidity options, including equity markets, making its stated financing constraint directly relevant to the court-ordered amount.
  • Austrac sought a $400 million penalty, while Moore cited remediation and overlapping prior penalties in reducing the fine to $260 million.

What to watch next

  • Whether Star raises money to pay the $260 million penalty, as Moore said it may need to do.
  • Whether Star uses any of the liquidity options it described, including access to equity markets.
  • Whether Star appeals the Federal Court order; the account does not report an appeal or a decision on one.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Center Only· 5 Center
Where the outlets are based: Asia 60% · US/Canada 20% · Other 20%
Outlet political mix
Center Only
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
5 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: Asia
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (5 of 5 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Star City casino opened in Sydney.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. Australia passed the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. Echo Entertainment Group began trading after its demerger from Tabcorp.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. A review led by Adam Bell found Star unsuitable to hold its Sydney casino licence.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  5. The NSW casino regulator suspended Star Sydney’s casino licence and appointed an independent manager.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

In December 2024, the Federal Court ordered The Star’s casino businesses to pay a $100 million penalty after they admitted extensive failures to meet anti-money-laundering obligations; AUSTRAC had begun civil proceedings in 2022. That case followed state inquiries into Star’s operations and suitability to hold casino licences.

A 2022 NSW review led by Adam Bell found Star unsuitable to hold its Sydney casino licence, citing compliance failures and dealings with high-risk patrons. Queensland’s 2022 review also found Star unsuitable to hold its licences there.

Original sources

1 of 5 articles · Global · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.