Three former OpenAI researchers say company fired them after raising AI safety concerns, letter says
Three former OpenAI researchers — Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak and Jasmine Wang — say OpenAI fired them after they raised AI safety concerns. OpenAI told AFP on October 1 that an internal investigation found the researchers mishandled sensitive information outside established procedures.
AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Full text read from 1 of 5 outletsHow it's made
File photoWhat happened
Key facts
- Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak and Jasmine Wang say they were fired from OpenAI (per WION).
- The three published an open letter saying their dismissals raise questions about OpenAI's internal norms and could chill internal scrutiny (per WION, computing.co.uk, BBC).
- The open letter said, 'Our firing leaves us worried that the norms inside OpenAI are shifting.' (per WION).
- The researchers said they were prioritising AI safety over near-term corporate interests (per WION, Yahoo, BBC).
- OpenAI told AFP on October 1 that an internal investigation found the three had mishandled sensitive information outside established procedures, violating company policies and undermining trust (per WION).
- An OpenAI research executive told staff in a memo, 'We do not terminate employees for raising concerns,' an excerpt of which was shared with AFP (per WION).
- Balesni posted on X saying he believed they were fired for prioritising safety after a weeklong silence following the dismissals becoming public (per WION).
The brief
Three former OpenAI researchers — Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak and Jasmine Wang — say the company fired them after they raised concerns about the safety of advanced AI work. The researchers published an open letter that, according to WION, warned that their dismissals signal a shift in internal norms and could chill internal scrutiny at OpenAI. The letter said, 'Our firing leaves us worried that the norms inside OpenAI are shifting.'
OpenAI provided a different account to AFP, telling the news agency on October 1 that an internal investigation concluded the three had mishandled sensitive information outside established procedures, which the company said violated policy and undermined trust. WION reports that an excerpt of an internal memo quoted an OpenAI research executive saying, 'We do not terminate employees for raising concerns.'
WION says the researchers framed their departures as a consequence of prioritising safety over near-term corporate interests; the outlet reports the trio argued that sudden terminations of staff who raise concerns endanger broader safeguards. Mikita Balesni later posted on X that he believed the dismissals were driven by their safety emphasis, breaking a weeklong silence after the terminations became public, WION reports. The account WION published includes the researchers’ claim that nearly 400 OpenAI employees had signed a petition in July calling for an industry-wide slowdown in the development of advanced AI models. WION presents that petition figure as part of the researchers’ case that internal pressure existed for slower, safer development. OpenAI's statement to AFP, cited by WION, places the issue on procedural grounds: the company said its investigation found policy violations related to handling sensitive information. WION also reports the internal memo line denying that OpenAI fires employees for raising concerns, a claim the company used in its internal communications according to the outlet. Other outlets ran related headlines corroborating that former OpenAI researchers allege they were dismissed over safety warnings, but WION's article contains the detailed timeline and quotations cited here. The dispute between the researchers' public letter and OpenAI's account to AFP frames the immediate disagreement over whether the firings reflect safety-related retaliation or violations of company procedures.
Why it matters
- The three named former researchers — Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak and Jasmine Wang — say the terminations could chill internal scrutiny at OpenAI, risking fewer employee-raised safety checks inside the company.
- OpenAI told AFP that an internal investigation found mishandling of sensitive information and cited company policy violations, meaning the outcome directly affects the firm's internal compliance and trust mechanisms.
- The researchers say nearly 400 OpenAI employees signed a July petition calling for an industry-wide slowdown in advanced AI development, indicating a sizable internal constituency for stronger safety measures.
What to watch next
- Whether OpenAI publishes the findings or a summary of the internal investigation that it cited to AFP on October 1.
- Whether the three former researchers make further public disclosures or legal claims about the grounds for their dismissals.
- Whether OpenAI leadership circulates additional internal guidance or memos addressing the researchers' open letter and the claim that the company does not terminate employees for raising concerns.
How it's being covered
Coverage analysisShow details5 source articles · 5 unique outlets · 4 distinct reportsCoverage mix: Center Only· 3 CenterWhere the outlets are based: Europe 40% · Asia 40% · Other 20%
- Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 3 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How outlets' accounts compare
How we got here
On Oct. 1, OpenAI told AFP that an internal investigation had concluded three researchers had mishandled sensitive information outside established procedures. In July, nearly 400 OpenAI employees signed a petition calling for an industry-wide slowdown in advanced AI model development. The researchers named in reporting are Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak and Jasmine Wang.
Original sources
2 of 5 articles · Europe · Show allEvery story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources
Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.