Skip to content
Sign in
Law & Justice · Asia Pacific

Five injured at Camp Sovereignty as Thomas Sewell pleads guilty

Thomas Sewell and three others pleaded guilty to violent disorder over the Camp Sovereignty incident in King’s Domain, where five people were injured. Sewell disputes that the violence targeted Aboriginal people and says his group was provoked.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 2 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 1 of 2 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 9 entries
This story was corrected on Oct 28, 2026 following an editorial review.
2 outletsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Too few ratedL 0 · C 2 · R 0
Updat3 graphic: Australia
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • Five people were injured in the incident at the Indigenous protest site in King’s Domain.
  • Sewell said his group was provoked and disputed that the violence targeted Aboriginal people.
  • Sewell’s lawyer, Dermot Dann, KC, said witnesses would give evidence at a pre-sentence hearing and contextual facts would be contested.
  • Jake Crockett, Michael Saarinen and Nathan Bull were the other men who pleaded guilty to violent disorder.
  • Five other men admitted roles in the attack and will face a pre-sentence hearing.
  • The incident followed an anti-immigration protest in Melbourne’s city centre.

The brief

Thomas Sewell and three other men pleaded guilty to one count of violent disorder over the Camp Sovereignty incident in King’s Domain, where five people were injured. The Sydney Morning Herald reported that Sewell’s plea did not settle disputes over the circumstances surrounding the violence or whether it constituted an attack on Aboriginal people.

The incident took place in August 2025 at the Indigenous protest site. The Sydney Morning Herald said it followed an anti-immigration protest in Melbourne’s city centre. Its report identifies the other men who pleaded guilty as Jake Crockett, Michael Saarinen and Nathan Bull. After entering their pleas, the four men said, “I contest the facts,” according to the newspaper.

Sewell later told reporters that he did not dispute that spontaneous violence occurred. He said the dispute concerned whether the violence had causes and whether those causes had a direct relationship to what happened. He also said the incident was not an attack on Aboriginal people.

Sewell’s lawyer, Dermot Dann, KC, said witnesses would give evidence at a pre-sentence hearing, where contextual facts would be contested. Dann described the context as “Antifa and protesters causing violence to cars,” the newspaper reported. The defence said witnesses would give accounts of what other people did and how they behaved around the incident.

The proceedings also involve five other men, who admitted roles in the attack and are due to face a pre-sentence hearing, according to The Sydney Morning Herald. The report does not specify the roles they admitted. Their admissions are separate from the guilty pleas entered by Sewell and the three other men.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported that Sewell, Crockett, Saarinen and Bull would return to court on November 9. Dann’s account indicates that witnesses and disputed contextual facts are expected to feature in the pre-sentence hearing; the report does not give a date for that hearing.

The guilty pleas establish the men’s pleas to violent disorder, while Sewell’s stated position leaves the characterization and context of the incident contested.

Why it matters

  • Five people were injured in the incident at Camp Sovereignty in King’s Domain.
  • The case involves distinct legal outcomes: four men pleaded guilty to violent disorder, while five other men admitted roles in the attack and will face a pre-sentence hearing.
  • Sewell contests whether the incident was an attack on Aboriginal people and disputes the relationship between the violence and its causes.

What to watch next

  • Watch for the court to set a date for the pre-sentence hearing; the supplied report gives no timetable.
  • At that hearing, watch for testimony from witnesses and for Sewell’s lawyer, Dermot Dann, KC, to contest the contextual facts surrounding the violence.
  • Watch for the judge’s assessment of how the defendants’ guilty pleas and the disputed context affect sentencing.
  • Watch for any sentencing submissions or outcome for Sewell, Jake Crockett, Michael Saarinen and Nathan Bull.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
2 source articles · 2 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Too few rated· 2 Center
Where the outlets are based: Asia 100%
Outlet political mix
Too few rated
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
2 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
2 unique outletsDominant coverage: Asia
Limited coverage
  • Coverage is currently limited to 2 outlets.
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. The First Fleet arrived at Sydney Cove, marking the beginning of British colonisation in Australia.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. On 26 January 1938, Aboriginal leaders including William Cooper organised a Day of Mourning in Sydney, protesting the effects of colonisation and seeking civil rights.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. Aboriginal activists later helped establish the Aboriginal Tent Embassy in Canberra on 26 January 1972, making protest on the national holiday a recurring form of political action.
    Background · from our historical context
  4. The Australian Parliament passed the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act, creating a statutory land-claim system in the Territory.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  5. The Victorian Parliament passed the Advancing the Treaty Process with Aboriginal Victorians Act in 2018, creating a framework for negotiations between the state and Aboriginal Victorians.
    Background · from our historical context
  6. The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria, elected in 2019, became the Aboriginal representative body in that process.
    Background · from our historical context
  7. In 2022, the state and the Assembly established the independent Treaty Authority to oversee treaty negotiations.
    Background · from our historical context
  8. The camp had been established on 26 January 2024 by Indigenous activists, who used the site to protest Australia Day and call for recognition of Aboriginal sovereignty and a treaty.
    Background · from our historical context
  9. On 26 January 2025, an anti-immigration rally took place in central Melbourne before the incident at Camp Sovereignty in King’s Domain.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

On 26 January 2025, an anti-immigration rally took place in central Melbourne before the incident at Camp Sovereignty in King’s Domain. The camp had been established on 26 January 2024 by Indigenous activists, who used the site to protest Australia Day and call for recognition of Aboriginal sovereignty and a treaty.

The Victorian Parliament passed the Advancing the Treaty Process with Aboriginal Victorians Act in 2018, creating a framework for negotiations between the state and Aboriginal Victorians. The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria, elected in 2019, became the Aboriginal representative body in that process.

Original sources

2 articles from 2 outlets · Asia · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.