Skip to content
Defense & Security · North America

Ryan ties Western Hemisphere economic dominance to US security strategy

Gen. Joseph Ryan said the 2025 National Security Strategy treats economic dominance in the Western Hemisphere as a national security priority. He made the remarks at the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting, while another account said he described China’s growing economic influence and Lebanese Hezbollah’s presence as concerns.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 3 independent reports from 4 outlets · Full text read from 2 of 3 reportsHow it's made

View timeline · 3 entries
4 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Center OnlyL 0 · C 3 · R 0 · 1 unrated
Updat3 graphic: United States
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • Gen. Joseph Ryan said the 2025 National Security Strategy makes economic dominance in the Western Hemisphere a national security priority (per armytimes.com, ssbcrack.com).
  • Ryan is the commander of the U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command (per armytimes.com, ssbcrack.com, ua.news).
  • Ryan described the 2025 strategy as an effort to reclaim economic ground that the People’s Republic of China had increasingly influenced over the past two decades (per ssbcrack.com, armytimes.com).

The brief

Gen. Joseph Ryan said the 2025 National Security Strategy makes economic dominance in the Western Hemisphere a national security priority, linking the US military’s regional role to economic aims. Ryan, commander of the U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command, spoke at the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting during a panel discussion.

The Army Times account describes Ryan’s remarks as a goal of “economic supremacy” and says he outlined plans to expand the US military footprint in Central and South America. It identifies Gen. Luis Cardozo and Vice Adm. Jo-Ann Burdian as the other panel participants. The account does not give further detail on the proposed expansion or specify what it would involve.

A separate account adds a sharper explanation of the economic rationale. It says Ryan described the strategy as an effort to reclaim economic ground increasingly influenced by the People’s Republic of China over the past two decades. That account says Ryan characterized this influence as a significant threat to US national security.

These are Ryan’s stated views, not independent findings about the scale of China’s influence or its security effects. The same account says Ryan expressed concern about the presence of groups such as Lebanese Hezbollah in the area. It does not describe any specific activity by the group, identify a particular location, or connect that concern to a named operation or policy.

The remarks therefore establish that Ryan raised the issue, but not the details or evidence behind the concern. The central emphasis across the accounts is Ryan’s stated link between economic position and security strategy.

The additional account frames China’s economic influence and Lebanese Hezbollah’s presence as concerns, while the Army Times account highlights a proposed expansion of the US military footprint in Central and South America. The accounts do not provide details that reconcile these emphases or explain how the military expansion would address the economic objective.

The remarks were made at the annual meeting, but the accounts do not specify the calendar date of the panel. They also do not report a decision, funding commitment, deployment schedule, or response from the People’s Republic of China or Lebanese Hezbollah.

The documented event is Ryan’s presentation of economic dominance as a security priority and his stated concerns; the operational steps, if any, remain unspecified in these accounts.

Why it matters

  • Ryan’s stated strategy links US national security priorities to economic influence in the Western Hemisphere, making the region’s economic position part of the rationale he gave for US military policy.
  • The Army Times account says Ryan outlined an expansion of the US military footprint in Central and South America; such an expansion would directly affect military activity in those regions, though the account gives no scale or schedule.
  • The separate account identifies the People’s Republic of China’s economic influence and Lebanese Hezbollah’s presence as concerns Ryan raised, but supplies no specific economic mechanism, local population impact, or evidence detailing those concerns.

What to watch next

  • Whether the U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command provides details of the military-footprint expansion Ryan described.
  • Whether the 2025 National Security Strategy’s stated economic priority is followed by specific policy or operational decisions.
  • Whether US officials provide evidence or further detail for Ryan’s stated concerns about the People’s Republic of China’s influence and Lebanese Hezbollah’s presence.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
4 source articles · 4 unique outlets · 3 distinct reports
Coverage mix: Center Only· 3 Center
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 25% · Europe 25% · Other 50%
Coverage mix
Center Only
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
3 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
4 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 3 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

2 framing differences · 2 uncorroborated claims · 4 information gaps
Sources broadly agree on the core facts but frame the story differently.Compared across 2 reports whose full text Updat3 used; 1 other outlet was checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources agree on the facts but emphasise different angles, actors or consequences.
  • The Army Times account emphasizes Ryan’s description of economic supremacy and a planned expansion of the US military footprint in Central and South America; the separate account focuses on efforts to reclaim economic ground influenced by the People’s Republic of China and on Lebanese Hezbollah’s presence.
  • The separate account attributes concerns about the People’s Republic of China’s economic influence and Lebanese Hezbollah’s presence to Ryan but provides no supporting detail in its excerpt.
Updat3: The underlying facts agree; only the emphasis differs.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • Ryan described American “economic supremacy” as an overarching goal of Washington’s regional security strategy, according to the Army Times excerpt.
  • The separate account says Ryan characterized the People’s Republic of China’s economic influence as a significant threat to US national security.
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The accounts do not detail the economic activity or specific mechanisms behind the claim that the People’s Republic of China has increasingly influenced economic ground in the region.
  • The accounts do not provide evidence or specific examples for the stated concern about Lebanese Hezbollah’s presence.
  • The accounts do not describe the proposed military expansion’s size, funding, locations, timeline, or effects on local populations.
  • The accounts do not specify the details, scale, or schedule of the military-footprint expansion.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. The older strategic origins date to President James Monroe’s address to Congress on December 2, 1823, which warned European powers against further colonization in the Americas.
    Background · from our historical context
  2. In 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced the Belt and Road Initiative, later extended to Latin American and Caribbean countries.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. The United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement replaced NAFTA in 2020.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

The 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy followed the 2022 strategy issued under President Joe Biden, which described competition with China as a defining feature of U.S. foreign policy.

The 2025 document arrived after two decades in which China expanded its trade and diplomatic ties across Latin America and the Caribbean, including through the China–CELAC Forum, established in 2015. In 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced the Belt and Road Initiative, later extended to Latin American and Caribbean countries.

Original sources

4 articles from 4 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.