Skip to content
Sign in
Defense & Security · Middle East

Persian Gulf oil exports top pre-war average as ship attacks mount

Kpler data cited by the New York Post and Arab News put Persian Gulf oil shipments above their pre-war average last week, at more than 24 million barrels a day. The UK Maritime Trade Operations Centre and maritime tracking firms reported at least 30 ship attacks in October, while about 14 million barrels a day passed through the Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 2 of 5 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 12 entries
5 outlets3 regionsLatest reporting 4 min read
Coverage: MixedL 1 · C 1 · R 1 · 2 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Iran
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • The pre-war average for Persian Gulf oil exports was 23.3 million barrels a day (per New York Post).
  • The UK Maritime Trade Operations Centre and maritime tracking firms reported at least 30 ship attacks in October (per New York Post).
  • Kpler said transport for a supertanker carrying Gulf crude to China reached $37.37 a barrel that week (per New York Post).

The brief

Persian Gulf oil exports exceeded their pre-war average last week even as maritime bodies and tracking firms reported at least 30 ship attacks in October. Kpler data cited by the New York Post and Arab News put shipments above 24 million barrels a day, compared with a pre-war average of 23.3 million.

The New York Post described the month as the most violent on the Strait of Hormuz since March. Flows through the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf of Oman averaged about 14 million barrels a day, according to the figures reported by both outlets. That put traffic through the strait at more than 80% of its pre-war level.

The overall export total includes oil shipped through the strait and other routes; the New York Post specifically mentions Gulf pipelines and alternative routes. The New York Post attributes the October ship-attack count to the UK Maritime Trade Operations Centre and maritime tracking firms.

Its account describes the attacks as Iranian, while Middle East Eye’s headline also connects a surge in Hormuz attacks with Iran. The excerpts do not provide a separate account from Iran or a detailed attribution for individual incidents, so responsibility for specific attacks cannot be established from the reported figures alone.

Arab News places the renewed flows in the sequence of the war: it says the United States and Israel launched airstrikes on Iran on Feb. 28, after which Iran attempted to block the Strait of Hormuz. Arab News reports that the attempted blockade sharply reduced oil exports from the region and shook the global economy.

The current shipment figures therefore mark a recovery in exports from that earlier disruption, but they do not show that all routes have returned to their pre-war levels. The New York Post reports that moving a supertanker carrying Gulf crude to China cost $37.37 a barrel that week, a near-record price according to Kpler.

It also says a China-based ship staffing company offered as much as $25,000 for a round-trip that usually takes a week or two. Those figures show the additional costs and incentives associated with keeping crews and tankers moving through the waterway, even while aggregate exports have risen.

Arab News reports Brent crude at about $109 on Wednesday and says prices remained high despite the increase in shipments, linking that persistence to tensions around the waterway and conflict elsewhere in the region. The coverage thus presents two concurrent measures: export volumes above the pre-war benchmark, and oil-market and shipping costs that remain elevated.

The headline from BigGo Finance similarly says normalization is far off, while providing no further details in its headline. The immediate outlook depends on whether tanker traffic can continue alongside reported attacks and whether shipments through the strait keep recovering.

The sources provide no specific forecast or timetable for a return to pre-war flows through Hormuz; the reported 14 million barrels a day remains below the 23.3 million-barrel pre-war benchmark for the region’s total exports, a comparison of different measures rather than a direct like-for-like route estimate.

Why it matters

  • Persian Gulf exporters shipped more than 24 million barrels a day, above the 23.3 million pre-war average, while about 14 million barrels a day moved through the Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman.
  • Tanker operators face a concrete cost burden: Kpler put transport for a supertanker carrying Gulf crude to China at $37.37 a barrel, while a China-based staffing company offered up to $25,000 for a round-trip.
  • Oil buyers and consumers face a market still pricing in disruption: Arab News reported Brent crude at about $109 on Wednesday despite the higher export flows.
  • The UK Maritime Trade Operations Centre and maritime tracking firms reported at least 30 ship attacks in October, putting the security of crews and commercial vessels on a route carrying a large share of regional oil shipments at issue.

What to watch next

  • Whether Persian Gulf shipments remain above the 23.3 million-barrel-a-day pre-war average.
  • Whether flows through the Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman continue to recover from the reported average of about 14 million barrels a day.
  • Whether the UK Maritime Trade Operations Centre and maritime tracking firms report further ship attacks after the at least 30 recorded in October.
  • Whether tanker transport costs and Brent crude remain elevated alongside the reported export recovery.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
6 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Mixed· 1 Left · 1 Center · 1 Right · 2 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Middle East 40% · US/Canada 20% · Other 40%
Outlet political mix
Mixed
Left
Center
Right
1 outlet
1 outlet
1 outlet
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 2 unrated outlets are not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: Middle East
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

3 framing differences · 2 uncorroborated claims · 3 information gaps
The reports repeat the same account with different emphasis; its central claims are not independently confirmed in the reporting Updat3 read.Compared across 2 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 3 other outlets were checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • The New York Post foregrounds the reported ship attacks and high tanker transport costs alongside the export increase; Arab News emphasizes the earlier export disruption and continuing high Brent price.
  • Middle East Eye, demokratis.co.id and BigGo Finance headlines corroborate the above-pre-war export trend; Middle East Eye and BigGo Finance also foreground attacks, while BigGo Finance adds that normalization is far off.
  • The New York Post attributes the reported attacks to Iran; Arab News says Iran attempted to block the Strait after the U.S.-Israeli airstrikes but does not separately attribute the October ship attacks.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • The New York Post describes the reported October attacks as Iranian, but the provided account does not attribute each incident individually or include an Iranian account.
  • BigGo Finance’s headline says normalization is far off, but gives no supporting detail in the headline.
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The sources do not give civilian casualty figures connected to the ship attacks.
  • The sources do not identify an international investigation, court process or UN finding concerning the attacks.
  • The sources do not identify the owners or funding of the maritime tracking firms.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. The longer history of US-Iranian antagonism includes the August 19, 1953, CIA- and MI6-backed coup that overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and strengthened Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s rule.
    Background · from our historical context
  2. A prior precedent for wartime threats to Gulf shipping came during the Iran-Iraq War, which began when Iraq invaded Iran on September 22, 1980.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. The United Nations adopted the Convention on the Law of the Sea, which established rules for passage through international straits.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. From 1984, both countries attacked commercial vessels and oil facilities in what became known as the Tanker War.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. In July 1987, the United States began Operation Earnest Will, escorting reflagged Kuwaiti tankers through the Gulf.
    Background · from our historical context
  6. On July 3, 1988, the USS Vincennes shot down Iran Air Flight 655 over the Strait of Hormuz, killing 290 people; the United States said its crew had mistaken the civilian aircraft for an attacking military plane.
    Background · from our historical context
  7. The Iran-Iraq ceasefire took effect on August 20, 1988.
    Background · from our historical context
  8. Two tankers were damaged in the Gulf of Oman; the United States blamed Iran, which denied involvement.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  9. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps seized the British-flagged tanker Stena Impero in the Strait of Hormuz.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  10. Iran seized the South Korean-flagged tanker Hankuk Chemi in the Persian Gulf.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  11. The United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes across Iran.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  12. Iran announced that vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz would need prior authorization from the IRGC Navy.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes on Iranian power plants, air defenses and military infrastructure, beginning the war that forms the immediate security backdrop to Persian Gulf shipping.

The Strait of Hormuz, between Iran and Oman, is a narrow passage linking the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the open ocean, making security there directly relevant to Gulf oil exports.

Original sources

1 of 6 articles · Unknown · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.