Skip to content
Defense & Security · Middle East

IRGC says Iran plans to unveil ‘Father of All Bombs’ and shift strategy

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps says it is preparing to unveil a weapon called the “Father of All Bombs.” IRGC spokesperson Hossein Mohebi also said Iran’s military strategy would emphasize asymmetric warfare and offensive action.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 2 of 5 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 8 entries
5 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 4 min read
Coverage: Mostly CenterL 0 · C 3 · R 1 · 1 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Iran
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it is preparing to unveil a weapon called the “Father of All Bombs.” (per WION, 8am.media, The Jerusalem Post).
  • IRGC spokesperson Hossein Mohebi said Iran’s missiles had improved in range, destructive power and accuracy (per 8am.media).
  • Mohebi said Iran’s military strategy would focus on asymmetric warfare and that Iran would respond offensively to attacks (per 8am.media, WION).
  • The GBU-43/B weighs around 9,800 kilograms and is one of the largest non-nuclear conventional bombs in the U.S. arsenal (per WION, 8am.media).
  • WION and 8am.media reported that the IRGC announced its planned weapon unveiling on Wednesday, October 21 (per WION, 8am.media).

The brief

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps says it is preparing to unveil a weapon it calls the “Father of All Bombs,” while describing a military strategy that would emphasize asymmetric warfare and offensive action. IRGC spokesperson Hossein Mohebi made the announcement on Wednesday, October 21, according to WION and 8am.media.

Mohebi also said Iran’s missiles had improved in range, destructive power and accuracy. Those statements describe the IRGC’s claims about its capabilities; the accounts do not independently assess the missile changes or provide supporting measurements. The announcement followed remarks by U.S.

President Donald Trump about the possible use of the GBU-43/B against Iranian nuclear facilities. WION and 8am.media report that Trump raised the possibility on Friday. The Jerusalem Post’s headline characterizes his remarks as a “threat,” while WION and 8am.media describe the possibility of using the bomb without adopting that label.

The GBU-43/B, also called the “Mother of All Bombs,” weighs about 9,800 kilograms, or 21,600 pounds, and is among the largest non-nuclear conventional bombs in the U.S. arsenal, according to WION. 8am.media also gives its weight as approximately 9,800 kilograms and describes it as one of the largest conventional non-nuclear bombs in the U.S. military arsenal.

The names “Father of All Bombs” and “Mother of All Bombs” place Iran’s planned unveiling alongside the U.S. weapon in the public discussion. The sources do not establish that the planned Iranian weapon matches the GBU-43/B in size, function or destructive power, and they provide no technical specifications for Iran’s weapon.

The Jerusalem Post headline links Iran’s announcement to what it calls Trump’s “MOAB threat.” WION and 8am.media likewise connect the announcement with Trump’s comments, but neither excerpt reports details about the circumstances of those remarks.

NDTV Profit’s headline frames the announcement as a warning, and The Times of India headline describes Tehran as threatening with the weapon; those headline characterizations go beyond the direct detail in the excerpts, which report the IRGC’s planned unveiling and Mohebi’s stated strategy.

WION also describes a banner seen in Tehran on September 9, 2026, bearing the words “We will kill Trump” in English and Persian. The excerpt does not identify who put up the banner or connect it to the IRGC’s announcement. The reporting gives no account of the weapon’s development timeline or of a specific next step beyond the planned unveiling.

Why it matters

  • The stated possibility of using the U.S. GBU-43/B against Iranian nuclear facilities and the IRGC’s planned weapon unveiling put military capabilities at the center of the public exchange; the bomb cited in the coverage weighs about 9,800 kilograms.
  • Iran’s population and U.S. personnel or civilians near any future military action could face physical harm, but the reports provide no casualty figures or account of an attack tied to this announcement.
  • The U.S. and Iran express opposing military positions in the coverage: Trump raised possible use of the GBU-43/B against Iranian nuclear facilities, while Mohebi said Iran would emphasize offensive action and asymmetric warfare.

What to watch next

  • Whether the IRGC carries out the announced unveiling of the “Father of All Bombs.”
  • Whether the IRGC provides technical details about the planned weapon.
  • Whether Donald Trump makes a further statement about possible use of the GBU-43/B against Iranian nuclear facilities.
  • Whether Iran’s military puts Mohebi’s stated emphasis on asymmetric warfare and offensive action into practice.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Mostly Center· 3 Center · 1 Right · 1 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Asia 60% · Middle East 20% · Other 20%
Outlet political mix
Mostly Center
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
3 outlets
1 outlet
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: Asia
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 4 rated sources); comparatively few Left-rated outlets have published on the event.
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

2 framing differences · 3 uncorroborated claims · 4 information gaps
The reports repeat the same account with different emphasis; its central claims are not independently confirmed in the reporting Updat3 read.Compared across 2 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 3 other outlets were checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • The Jerusalem Post headline calls Trump’s remarks a “MOAB threat”; WION and 8am.media report that he raised the possibility of using the bomb against Iranian nuclear facilities without using that label.
  • NDTV Profit’s headline calls Iran’s announcement a warning, and The Times of India headline says Tehran threatens with the weapon; the WION and 8am.media excerpts describe a planned unveiling and Mohebi’s strategy statements.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • WION reports a banner in Tehran threatening Trump but does not identify who displayed it or link it to the IRGC.
  • Mohebi said Iran would respond offensively to attacks, according to 8am.media.
  • The IRGC referred to its planned weapon as the “Father of All Bombs.”
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The sources do not describe the circumstances surrounding Trump’s comments about possible use of the GBU-43/B.
  • The sources provide no casualty figures or reported civilian harm connected to the planned weapon announcement.
  • The sources do not identify who displayed the banner described by WION.
  • The sources do not establish the specifications or capabilities of Iran’s planned weapon.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Iran established the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. Iran developed relationships with armed groups including Hezbollah, founded in Lebanon in 1982, as part of its regional deterrence.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. The Trump administration designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a foreign terrorist organization.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. The campaign placed Iran’s military posture in the context of direct attacks on its territory, following exchanges between Iran and Israel in 2024.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. On April 1, 2024, a strike on an Iranian diplomatic compound in Damascus killed senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officers; Israel was widely attributed responsibility.
    Background · from our historical context
  6. Iran fired missiles at Israel, saying it was responding to Israeli actions including the killing of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and IRGC commander Abbas Nilforoushan.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  7. The United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes across Iran.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  8. Iran announced that vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz would need prior authorization from the IRGC Navy.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes on Iranian power plants, air defenses and military infrastructure, beginning a war that remained ongoing by October 2026. The campaign placed Iran’s military posture in the context of direct attacks on its territory, following exchanges between Iran and Israel in 2024.

On April 1, 2024, a strike on an Iranian diplomatic compound in Damascus killed senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officers; Israel was widely attributed responsibility. Iran attacked Israel with drones and missiles on April 13–14, describing the barrage as retaliation for the Damascus strike.

Original sources

5 articles from 5 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.