Skip to content
Sign in
Geopolitics · Europe

Democratic lawmakers say Russia is targeting candidates with disinformation

Democratic leaders on Congress’s intelligence committees said Russia is targeting Democratic candidates and supporters of Ukraine from both parties with disinformation ahead of the midterms. Representative Jim Himes called a classified Tuesday report a “grab bag” of foreign-power activity, while Senator Mark Warner said, “We’ve not seen that.”

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 4 independent reports from 5 outlets · Article text read from 1 of 4 reportsHow it's made

View timeline · 8 entries
5 outlets4 regionsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Mostly CenterL 0 · C 3 · R 1 · 1 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Russia
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • Lawmakers said a U.S. briefing showed Russia targeting Democrats with misinformation (per nextgov.com, The Jerusalem Post, mezha.net).
  • The top Democrats on Congress’s intelligence committees said Russia is targeting Democratic candidates and supporters of Ukraine from both parties with disinformation ahead of the midterms (per nextgov.com).

The brief

Democratic leaders on Congress’s intelligence committees said Russia is targeting Democratic candidates and supporters of Ukraine from both parties with disinformation ahead of the midterm elections, Nextgov.com reported. The lawmakers made the allegation Wednesday as they described foreign efforts to influence voters and undermine confidence in U.S. elections.

Representative Jim Himes characterized a classified report from Tuesday as a “grab bag” of activity by foreign powers. His description indicates the report covered more than the Russia-related activity raised publicly, but the report’s contents were not disclosed in the account. Senator Mark Warner said, “We’ve not seen that,” during a roundtable with reporters.

The excerpt does not identify what “that” referred to, so his comment cannot be tied to a particular claim or read as a direct denial of the allegation about Russia. Himes also said, “They can activate the Houthis if they want to.” The account does not specify who “they” referred to or provide further detail about the statement.

It presents the remark alongside the discussion of foreign activity, but does not explain how Himes connected it to the classified report or the claims about election disinformation. The account places the lawmakers’ comments in the run-up to the midterms and says they were outlining efforts to affect voters and weaken trust in U.S. elections.

It does not describe the specific methods, targets, or evidence behind the alleged Russian activity, nor does it identify a public response from Russian officials. Nextgov.com also notes that Trump used declassified intelligence in July to revive claims about the 2020 election.

That reference provides context for the election-trust issue raised in the lawmakers’ remarks; the account does not spell out a connection between Trump’s claims and the activity discussed in the classified briefing. The immediate public account rests on the lawmakers’ descriptions of the briefing and their statements at the roundtable.

Why it matters

  • Democratic candidates and supporters of Ukraine from both parties are the specific groups lawmakers say Russia is targeting with disinformation.
  • Lawmakers framed the concern as an effort to influence U.S. voters and undermine trust in U.S. elections.
  • Himes’s comment about the Houthis points to a separate foreign-activity concern he raised, though the account does not identify who “they” means.

What to watch next

  • Whether the top Democrats on Congress’s intelligence committees provide further public detail about the alleged Russian disinformation targeting.
  • Whether Representative Jim Himes clarifies who he meant by “they” in his comment about the Houthis.
  • Whether Senator Mark Warner clarifies the subject of his remark, “We’ve not seen that.”

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets · 3 distinct reports
Outlet political mix: Mostly Center· 3 Center · 1 Right · 1 unrated
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 20% · Europe 20% · Other 60%
Outlet political mix
Mostly Center
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
3 outlets
1 outlet
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 4 rated sources); comparatively few Left-rated outlets have published on the event.
How we measure coverage

One source is from a wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP or Bloomberg), whose reporting other outlets often republish.

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Ukraine, Russia, and other parties signed the Minsk II agreement, which set out a ceasefire and political measures for eastern Ukraine.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. Americans voted in the presidential election that became the focus of U.S. investigations into Russian interference.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. On January 6, 2017, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence published an assessment concluding that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an influence campaign aimed at the election.
    Background · from our historical context
  4. In July 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence officers detailed alleged hacking of Democratic Party organizations and the release of stolen documents.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. The intelligence community published an assessment saying Putin authorized influence operations intended to denigrate Joe Biden’s candidacy and support Donald Trump’s reelection.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  6. On February 24, 2022, Russia launched its full-scale invasion; Moscow described its actions as a response to security threats, a characterization rejected by Ukraine and its supporters.
    Background · from our historical context
  7. On April 6, 2022, the U.S. government announced a campaign to counter Russian disinformation about the invasion, including releasing information about Russian plans and claims.
    Background · from our historical context
  8. Donald Trump won the presidency, and Republicans gained control of the Senate.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

The institutional record began with the 2016 U.S. election. On January 6, 2017, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence published an assessment concluding that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an influence campaign aimed at the election.

In July 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence officers detailed alleged hacking of Democratic Party organizations and the release of stolen documents. The Senate Intelligence Committee’s 2020 bipartisan report also documented Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

Original sources

1 of 5 articles · US/Canada · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.