Skip to content
Law & Justice · North America

Lawsuit says Tesla driver injured two Cal Poly students in San Luis Obispo

A lawsuit alleges that Ishan Pandhare struck Cal Poly students Lilianne Burke and Zoey Archibald with a Tesla in San Luis Obispo. The complaint says both students suffered injuries that required surgery and continuing medical care.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 3 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 1 of 3 outlets · 1 article captured only in partHow it's made

View timeline · 6 entries
This story was corrected on Oct 27, 2026 following an editorial review.
3 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 2 min read
Coverage: Too few ratedL 0 · C 1 · R 1 · 1 unrated
File photo
Photo: Larry D. Moore / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 4.0)

What happened

Key facts

  • The lawsuit alleges Ishan Pandhare, 20, hit Cal Poly students Lilianne Burke and Zoey Archibald, both 19, while they were walking with friends in San Luis Obispo.
  • The complaint was filed in San Luis Obispo County Superior Court.
  • The complaint says Pandhare was driving about 60 mph in a 25 mph zone.

The brief

A lawsuit alleges that Ishan Pandhare struck two Cal Poly students with a Tesla in San Luis Obispo, injuring both. The New York Post reported that the complaint names Lilianne Burke and Zoey Archibald, both 19, as the students and identifies Pandhare as 20.

TMZ’s headline also describes the driver as drunk and as a fraternity brother; its headline says the lawsuit makes that claim. The complaint alleges Pandhare was driving about 60 mph in a 25 mph zone when he hit the students. Those speeds are allegations in the lawsuit, not findings established by a court in the account.

The New York Post says the complaint was filed in San Luis Obispo County Superior Court. According to the New York Post’s account of the complaint, Burke and Archibald suffered injuries that required surgery and ongoing medical treatment. The report does not give further detail about the injuries or the treatment.

It does not state whether Pandhare or his representatives have responded to the allegations. The New York Post also reports that the complaint alleges Pandhare drove away after striking the students.

That allegation adds a claim about what happened immediately after the collision; the account does not describe a court ruling on the lawsuit or establish the allegation as a finding.

The complaint, as described by the New York Post, names a third person, Anna Grillo, 21, in connection with the case, alleging that she hosted a birthday gathering at her residence where alcohol was provided to Pandhare. The report does not establish that allegation as a court finding or describe Grillo’s response.

The central claims remain allegations made in a civil complaint: the alleged speed, the collision, the students’ resulting medical care, and the allegation that Pandhare left afterward. The specific next developments identified in the account are the parties’ positions and any court action on the claims; it provides no scheduled hearing or decision date.

Why it matters

  • Burke and Archibald bear the direct documented harm: the complaint says the two students needed surgery and ongoing medical treatment.
  • The alleged collision involved a Tesla and a claimed speed of about 60 mph in a 25 mph zone, according to the complaint.

What to watch next

  • Whether Pandhare responds to the allegations in the lawsuit.
  • Whether Grillo responds to the complaint’s allegation about the gathering and alcohol.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
3 source articles · 3 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Too few rated· 1 Center · 1 Right · 1 unrated
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 67% · Asia 33%
Outlet political mix
Too few rated
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
1 outlet
1 outlet
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
3 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. California adopted a constitution that established the modern Superior Court system.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. California established the California Polytechnic School in San Luis Obispo.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. California enacted Evidence Code section 669 on when a statutory violation can support a presumption of negligence.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. The California Supreme Court set out a general duty-of-care framework in Rowland v. Christian.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  5. The California Supreme Court adopted comparative negligence in Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  6. California enacted the Trial Court Unification Act, permitting trial courts to unify within each county.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

The state’s Vehicle Code, enacted in 1959 and effective in 1960, includes section 22350, the “basic speed law,” which bars driving faster than is reasonable or safe for conditions. California Vehicle Code section 22352 also sets prima facie speed limits, including 25 mph in specified areas. In *Rowland v.

Christian* (1968), the California Supreme Court set out a general duty-of-care framework for determining when a person may be liable for harm to another. In *Li v.

Original sources

3 articles from 3 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.