Skip to content
Sign in
Finance & Markets · Global

Macklem warns high energy prices could push Canadian inflation higher

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said persistently high global energy prices will lift Canada's inflation outlook. He said inflation could gradually rise from 3 per cent if oil stays near US$100, while the Bank weighs whether interest-rate increases may be needed.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 3 independent reports from 5 outlets · Article text read from 2 of 3 reportsHow it's made

View timeline · 7 entries
5 outletsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Center OnlyL 0 · C 3 · R 0 · 2 unrated
File photo
Photo: Bank of Canada - Banque du Canada / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

What happened

Key facts

  • Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said high global energy prices will push up the outlook for inflation in Canada (per The Globe and Mail, kelownadailycourier.ca).
  • Macklem said global economic resilience is being tested by a series of shocks (per The Globe and Mail, kelownadailycourier.ca).
  • Macklem said inflation could gradually rise from 3 per cent if oil prices remain around US$100 (per The Globe and Mail).
  • Macklem said the Bank of Canada will consider whether inflation will return to its target without rate increases or whether interest rates will need to rise (per The Globe and Mail, kelownadailycourier.ca, torontotoday.ca).
  • The Bank of Canada's next interest-rate decision and updated economic and inflation forecasts are scheduled for Oct. 28 (per The Globe and Mail, kelownadailycourier.ca).
  • The Bank of Canada's previous projection had inflation cooling to around 2.5 per cent in the second half of the year (per kelownadailycourier.ca, The Globe and Mail, torontotoday.ca).

The brief

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem warned that persistently high global energy prices will push up the inflation outlook in Canada, putting the path of interest rates under scrutiny ahead of the central bank’s next decision. Macklem said that if oil remains around US$100, inflation could gradually rise from its current 3 per cent level.

The Globe and Mail reported that Brent crude was trading at about US$110 and West Texas Intermediate at US$101. Those market prices provide context for his warning, though the statement about inflation describes a conditional outlook, not a confirmed future increase.

Macklem framed the issue as a choice for the Bank: whether inflation will return towards its target without intervention, or whether higher interest rates will be needed to influence its course. The Globe and Mail quoted him referring to the Bank’s 2 per cent target.

The question is central to the upcoming rate decision, but Macklem did not announce a decision in the reported remarks. The Bank of Canada is due to release updated economic and inflation forecasts alongside its interest-rate decision on Oct. 28. The Globe and Mail described that announcement as one of the final major data points before the decision.

The outlet also reported that, as of Friday, Bloomberg data showed financial markets assigning roughly a 35 per cent chance to a quarter-point increase on Oct. 28, rising to 95 per cent for the Dec. 9 decision. Those figures reflect market pricing, not a commitment by the Bank.

The Globe and Mail reported that Macklem spoke after an International Monetary Fund meeting and described global economic resilience as the key takeaway, while cautioning that it should not be assumed to continue.

The Kelowna Daily Courier likewise reported that he expressed confidence in Canada’s capacity to weather the strain, while emphasizing that resilience is being tested by continuing shocks and higher energy costs.

Its account specifically connected those pressures to the Middle East conflict; the Globe and Mail’s excerpt instead highlighted energy-market prices and Macklem’s remarks about attacks on civilians in Saudi Arabia. The Globe and Mail said Macklem referred to missile strikes against Saudi Arabia by a rebel group in Yemen.

The report did not provide further detail about those strikes or their effect on oil prices. Macklem’s broader concern, as reported by both outlets, was that shocks and elevated energy costs are challenging economic resilience and could influence inflation in Canada. The Bank’s Oct.

28 forecasts and rate decision will show how it assesses the inflation outlook alongside the energy-price pressure Macklem described. The Dec. 9 decision is another point referenced in the reported market pricing, but no rate decision for either meeting had been announced in these accounts.

Why it matters

  • Canadian households face the prospect of higher inflation if oil stays around US$100 and inflation rises from its reported 3 per cent level.
  • A rate increase could affect Canadian borrowers; Macklem said the Bank is weighing whether higher rates are needed to steer inflation towards its 2 per cent target.
  • The Bank’s Oct. 28 forecasts will indicate how its outlook compares with its previous projection of inflation near 2.5 per cent in the second half of the year.
  • Market pricing reported by Bloomberg put the chance of a quarter-point increase at about 35 per cent for Oct. 28 and 95 per cent for Dec. 9; these are market assessments, not Bank decisions.

What to watch next

  • Whether the Bank of Canada’s Oct. 28 forecasts revise its inflation outlook in light of energy prices.
  • Whether the Bank of Canada raises its benchmark rate at its Oct. 28 decision.
  • Whether oil prices remain around US$100, the level Macklem linked to a gradual rise in inflation.
  • Whether the Bank of Canada’s Dec. 9 decision aligns with the 95 per cent rate-increase probability reported in Bloomberg data.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets · 3 distinct reports
Outlet political mix: Center Only· 3 Center · 2 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Unknown 60% · US/Canada 40%
Outlet political mix
Center Only
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
3 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 2 unrated outlets are not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 3 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

2 framing differences · 3 uncorroborated claims · 3 information gaps
The reports repeat the same account with different emphasis; its central claims are not independently confirmed in the reporting Updat3 read.Compared across 2 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 1 other outlet was checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • The Kelowna Daily Courier explicitly linked economic strain to the continuing Middle East conflict and energy prices; The Globe and Mail foregrounded oil benchmarks and Macklem’s remarks about attacks on civilians in Saudi Arabia.
  • The Kelowna Daily Courier emphasized Macklem’s confidence in Canada’s ability to weather the pressure, while The Globe and Mail focused on the global economy’s resilience and the possibility of higher interest rates.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • The Globe and Mail attributes the reference to attacks on civilians in Saudi Arabia to Macklem and describes the strikes as carried out by a rebel group in Yemen; the Kelowna Daily Courier does not mention those strikes.
  • Macklem said inflation could gradually rise from 3 per cent if oil remains around US$100.
  • The Kelowna Daily Courier reported Macklem’s assessment that global resilience is increasingly “under strain.”
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • Neither account quantifies how higher energy costs have affected household budgets or individual Canadian industries.
  • Neither account provides details about the reported missile strikes against Saudi Arabia or independently verifies their effect on energy prices.
  • The reports do not establish how much of the oil-price movement or Canadian inflation outlook is attributable to any particular shock.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Parliament passed the Bank of Canada Act, establishing the central bank.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. The framework began in February 1991, when Finance Minister Michael Wilson and Bank of Canada Governor John Crow announced Canada’s first inflation-reduction targets.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. In 1993, the Bank and federal government adopted a 2 per cent target midpoint, which subsequent agreements retained.
    Background · from our historical context
  4. The Bank’s inflation-targeting framework, renewed with the federal government in 2021, sets a 2 per cent target within a 1-to-3-per-cent control range.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  6. The Bank of Canada raised its policy rate to 5 per cent.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  7. The Bank of Canada began cutting its policy rate.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

The Bank of Canada’s preceding projection called for inflation to ease to about 2.5 per cent in the second half of the year, setting a benchmark against which later energy-price pressures could be assessed. The Bank’s inflation-targeting framework, renewed with the federal government in 2021, sets a 2 per cent target within a 1-to-3-per-cent control range.

The framework began in February 1991, when Finance Minister Michael Wilson and Bank of Canada Governor John Crow announced Canada’s first inflation-reduction targets. In 1993, the Bank and federal government adopted a 2 per cent target midpoint, which subsequent agreements retained.

Original sources

3 of 5 articles · Unknown · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.