Meta reports $9.86 billion quarterly profit as legal charge cuts operating income
Meta Platforms reported third-quarter 2026 net income of $9.86 billion, while operating income fell 37% to $12.99 billion after a legal charge. The company said operating income would have been $22.88 billion without the charge, and revenue rose 26% to $64.6 billion.
AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 2 of 5 outlets · 1 article captured only in partHow it's made
View timeline · 4 entries
File photoWhat happened
Key facts
- Meta Platforms' third-quarter 2026 net income rose 264% year-on-year to $9.86 billion, compared with $2.71 billion a year earlier.
- Meta said operating income would have been $22.88 billion excluding the charge; diluted earnings per share would have been $7.40 instead of $3.83.
- Revenue rose 26%; ad impressions across Meta's family of applications increased 10%, and the average advertising price rose 14% year-on-year.
- Reported diluted earnings per share increased to $3.83 from $1.05 a year earlier.
The brief
Meta Platforms reported $9.86 billion in net income for the third quarter of 2026, a 264% increase from a year earlier, while a legal charge weighed heavily on operating income. The company recorded $12.99 billion in operating income, down 37% from $20.54 billion in the year-earlier quarter, despite revenue growth.
The Times of India reported that the $9.89 billion charge was tied to an agreement with 52 U.S. state attorneys general to resolve litigation concerning teen mental health and social media. The reported results distinguish net income from operating income: net income rose sharply, while the charge reduced the operating figure.
The coverage does not describe the agreement's terms or the litigation's resolution beyond its connection to the charge. Meta said operating income would have been $22.88 billion excluding the charge. The Desk reported the adjusted figure as $22.9 billion, a rounded version of the same amount.
Meta also said diluted earnings per share would have reached $7.40 without the charge; reported diluted earnings per share were $3.83, compared with $1.05 a year earlier. Revenue reached $64.6 billion, up 26% from $51.24 billion in the same period last year.
The Times of India detailed the advertising drivers: ad impressions across Meta's family of applications increased 10%, and the average advertising price rose 14%. Advertising revenue was $63.06 billion, also 26% higher year-on-year.
The Desk emphasized revenue growth alongside the effect of the legal charge on operating earnings, and reported that Meta continued investing heavily in artificial intelligence. Its account also put the quarter's daily active users across the company's applications at 3.64 billion in September, a 3% increase.
These figures offer a separate view of the business: advertising performance and user activity grew while the legal charge reduced reported operating income. The Times of India foregrounded the rise in net income and provided the charge's connection to the state attorneys general agreement, as well as the advertising measures.
Indian Television Dot Com's headline likewise highlighted revenue growth and the legal charge. BigGo's headline gave the revenue and charge figures, while Benzinga's headline identified an earnings-call transcript; those headlines do not provide further details about the earnings call or the transcript's contents.
Why it matters
- Meta's reported $9.89 billion legal charge reduced operating income to $12.99 billion, even as net income reached $9.86 billion; the charge was connected to litigation concerning teen mental health and social media.
- The agreement involved 52 U.S. state attorneys general, making the legal settlement a material factor in interpreting Meta's reported operating results.
- Advertising generated $63.06 billion of Meta's $64.6 billion quarterly revenue. Growth in ad impressions and average ad prices provides the specific mechanism behind the reported advertising increase.
- Meta reported 3.64 billion daily active users across its applications in September, up 3%, alongside continued investment in artificial intelligence reported by The Desk.
What to watch next
- Whether Meta reports further financial effects from the agreement with 52 U.S. state attorneys general.
- Whether Meta's next reported results show continued growth in ad impressions and average advertising prices.
- Whether Meta's subsequent disclosures show how continued artificial-intelligence investment relates to operating income.
- Whether Meta reports further changes in daily active users across its family of applications.
How it's being covered
Coverage analysisShow details5 source articles · 5 unique outletsOutlet political mix: Mostly Center· 1 Left · 3 Center · 1 unratedWhere the outlets are based: Unknown 60% · Asia 40%
- Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 4 rated sources); comparatively few Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How outlets' accounts compare
1 framing difference · 1 uncorroborated claim · 1 information gap- The Desk stresses revenue growth, the charge's effect on operating earnings, and continued artificial-intelligence investment; The Times of India emphasizes net income growth, the legal charge's connection to the agreement, and advertising metrics.
- Meta said operating income would have been $22.88 billion without the legal charge; The Desk rounded this figure to $22.9 billion.
- The sources do not provide the agreement's terms, the status or procedural details of the underlying litigation, or further information about the resolution.
Timeline
Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.- The Communications Decency Act, signed on February 8, 1996, included Section 230, which generally shields online services from liability for content posted by users.Background · from our historical context
- Mark Zuckerberg and his co-founders launched Facebook.Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
- Former Meta employee Frances Haugen testified to the Senate Commerce Committee about Instagram and young users.Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
- Meta announced Instagram Teen Accounts, with built-in protections for teenage users.Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
How we got here
On October 24, 2023, 33 U.S. states and the District of Columbia sued Meta in federal court, alleging that Instagram and Facebook used features that encouraged young people to use the platforms and harmed their mental health; nine other states filed separate suits.
The Communications Decency Act, signed on February 8, 1996, included Section 230, which generally shields online services from liability for content posted by users.
Original sources
5 articles from 5 outletsEvery story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources
Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.