Skip to content
Sign in
Technology · North America

Meta approves shares Zuckerberg could sell to pay proposed California tax

Meta approved non-voting Class C shares that Mark Zuckerberg could sell to cover a potential tax bill while keeping his voting control. Meta says it will also use the shares to raise capital, compensate employees and fund acquisitions, including AI investments.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 2 of 5 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 7 entries
5 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 3 min readNo new reporting in 4 days
Coverage: Mostly CenterL 1 · C 3 · R 0 · 1 unrated
File photo
Photo: InvadingInvader / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

What happened

Key facts

  • Meta’s board approved a new class of non-voting Class C common stock, which gives holders an ownership stake without votes on company decisions (per TechCrunch, newscord.org).
  • Meta said the new shares are intended for capital raising, employee compensation and acquisitions, including AI investments (per TechCrunch, newscord.org).
  • The New York Times reported that Mark Zuckerberg asked Meta’s board to develop a plan to protect him from California’s proposed billionaire tax (per TechCrunch, The New York Times).
  • Zuckerberg could immediately sell up to 20% of the Class C shares he receives, without reducing his voting control (per TechCrunch, newscord.org).
  • The proposed tax would apply only if voters approve California Proposition 40 (per TechCrunch, newscord.org).
  • Meta said the charter amendment introducing the new shares would take effect January 19 next year, with trading expected to start in January (per newscord.org).
  • Proposition 40 would impose a one-time 5% tax on California residents with net worth above $1 billion (per newscord.org, TechCrunch).
  • The proposed tax has been estimated to cost Zuckerberg as much as $11 billion (per TechCrunch).
  • Meta said Zuckerberg owns about 13% of the company and controls more than 60% of its voting power through its dual-class share structure (per newscord.org, TechCrunch).

The brief

Meta’s board approved a new class of non-voting Class C shares that could let Mark Zuckerberg sell part of his stake to pay a potential California wealth-tax bill without surrendering his voting control. Meta says the shares also serve corporate purposes, including raising capital, compensating employees and supporting acquisitions such as its AI investments.

The shares give holders an economic stake in Meta but no votes on company decisions. Meta said the arrangement would not change the voting power of any shareholder.

Under the plan described in the company filing, Zuckerberg could sell or transfer up to 20% of the Class C shares he receives, equivalent to 10% of his overall economic stake, while retaining majority voting control. The tax issue is conditional on California voters approving Proposition 40.

The proposal would impose a one-time 5% tax on residents whose net worth exceeds $1 billion, according to the account republished by newscord.org. TechCrunch reported that Zuckerberg’s potential bill has been estimated at as much as $11 billion. That figure is an estimate, not a confirmed assessment.

The New York Times reported that Zuckerberg asked Meta’s board to devise a plan to protect him from the proposed tax. In its account, Meta said the tax could require Zuckerberg to pay billions of dollars, depending on his equity stake. Meta also said he owns about 13% of the company while exercising more than 60% of its voting power through its dual-class share structure.

The board’s approval therefore addresses two separate concerns documented in the reporting: Meta’s stated plans to use the shares for financing, compensation and acquisitions, and the potential effect of the proposed tax on Zuckerberg’s holdings. The arrangement lets him sell a portion of the new shares without giving up the voting majority that Meta says he currently holds.

Meta plans to introduce the shares through a charter amendment effective January 19 next year, with trading expected to begin in January, according to newscord.org. The timing matters because the tax remains a proposal subject to a public vote; the reported share mechanism is approved, while any tax obligation depends on the ballot outcome.

The reports emphasize different parts of the decision: TechCrunch foregrounds the possible tax-payment use alongside Meta’s business plans, while newscord.org supplies the proposal’s 5% rate, eligibility threshold, implementation timing and the company’s account of Zuckerberg’s ownership and voting power.

South China Morning Post’s headline also links the new shares to Zuckerberg staying in California, while CBS News’ headline says Meta described him as having threatened to leave; those headlines do not provide further detail about either claim.

Why it matters

  • California residents with net worth above $1 billion could face a one-time 5% tax if voters approve Proposition 40; the proposal’s outcome determines whether Zuckerberg faces the potential tax bill.
  • Zuckerberg could sell up to 20% of the Class C shares he receives, with the reported estimate of his potential tax bill reaching as much as $11 billion.
  • Meta’s shareholders would receive a new non-voting share class, while Meta says the structure preserves the existing voting power and supports capital raising, employee compensation and acquisitions, including AI investments.
  • Meta says Zuckerberg owns about 13% of the company but controls more than 60% of its voting power, making the distinction between economic ownership and voting authority central to the plan.

What to watch next

  • Whether California voters approve Proposition 40, which would impose a one-time 5% tax on residents with net worth above $1 billion.
  • Whether Meta’s charter amendment takes effect January 19 next year, as described by newscord.org.
  • Whether trading in the Class C shares begins in January, as Meta said it expects.
  • Whether Zuckerberg sells or transfers any of the Class C shares he receives, up to the reported 20% limit.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
6 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Mostly Center· 1 Left · 3 Center · 1 unrated
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 80% · Asia 20%
Outlet political mix
Mostly Center
Left
Center
Right
1 outlet
3 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 4 rated sources); comparatively few Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among outlets based in US/Canada (4 of 5 geographically-identified sources).
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

3 framing differences · 2 uncorroborated claims · 2 information gaps
The reports repeat the same account with different emphasis; its central claims are not independently confirmed in the reporting Updat3 read.Compared across 2 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 3 other outlets were checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • TechCrunch presents the shares as serving Meta’s capital raising, employee compensation and acquisition plans while also potentially helping Zuckerberg pay the proposed tax; newscord.org adds detail about the tax rate, eligibility threshold, implementation timing and voting structure.
  • The South China Morning Post headline links the shares to Zuckerberg staying in California, while the CBS News headline says Meta described him as having threatened to leave; neither headline supplies supporting details.
  • The New York Times is credited with reporting that Zuckerberg asked Meta’s board for a tax-protection plan; Meta’s stated corporate purposes for the shares are reported separately.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • Meta said the proposed tax could require Zuckerberg to pay billions of dollars, depending on his equity stake.
  • The South China Morning Post headline says Zuckerberg gets shares to stay in California; the CBS News headline attributes to Meta the claim that he threatened to leave.
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The sources do not specify the proposed tax’s full implementation rules, how a voter-approved measure would calculate individual liabilities, or whether the proposal will appear on a ballot.
  • The estimated tax bill of as much as $11 billion is presented as an estimate; the actual amount would depend on the proposal taking effect and Zuckerberg’s tax liability.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Mark Zuckerberg and his co-founders launched Facebook.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. Facebook went public with Class A shares carrying one vote each and Class B shares carrying ten votes each.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. In 2016, Facebook proposed issuing non-voting Class C shares while preserving Mark Zuckerberg’s control through his higher-vote Class B shares.
    Background · from our historical context
  4. After shareholders sued in Delaware, the company abandoned that plan in June 2017.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. Facebook changed its name to Meta in October 2021, but the company’s share classes continued to reflect that structure.
    Background · from our historical context
  6. Meta released Llama 2 with licensing terms that permitted some commercial uses.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  7. Meta released its Llama 3 language model.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

In 2016, Facebook proposed issuing non-voting Class C shares while preserving Mark Zuckerberg’s control through his higher-vote Class B shares. After shareholders sued in Delaware, the company abandoned that plan in June 2017. The proposal established a direct precedent for separating Zuckerberg’s economic stake from his voting power.

Facebook’s dual-class structure dates to its 2012 initial public offering: publicly traded Class A shares carried one vote each, while Class B shares held by Zuckerberg and other insiders carried ten. That arrangement allowed Zuckerberg to retain voting control even as public investors bought shares.

Original sources

6 articles from 5 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.