Skip to content
Energy · Asia Pacific

Macklem sees higher inflation forecast as oil remains above US$100

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said the bank expects to raise its inflation forecast as oil prices remain above US$100. He said oil sustained near that level could push inflation above its current 3 per cent and lead the bank to consider interest-rate increases.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 4 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 3 of 4 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 5 entries
4 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 4 min read
Coverage: Too few ratedL 0 · C 2 · R 0 · 2 unrated
File photo
Photo: Bank of Canada - Banque du Canada / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

What happened

Key facts

  • Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said the bank expects to raise its inflation forecast this month as persistently high oil prices increase inflation risks (per The Globe and Mail, tekedia.com).
  • Macklem said Brent crude was trading around US$110 and West Texas Intermediate around US$101 (per The Globe and Mail).
  • Macklem said oil prices sustained near US$100 could push inflation higher from its current 3 per cent (per The Globe and Mail).
  • Macklem said the Bank of Canada will assess whether inflation can return to its 2 per cent target on its own or whether interest-rate increases may be needed (per The Globe and Mail, tekedia.com, battlefordsnow.com).
  • The Bank of Canada has weighed inflation risks against economic growth risks linked to the trade war with the United States (per The Globe and Mail, tekedia.com, battlefordsnow.com).
  • Australian inflation rose 0.4 per cent in August and would have fallen without higher petrol prices that month (per The Sydney Morning Herald).

The brief

Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem said the central bank expects to raise its inflation forecast this month as oil prices remain high, putting possible interest-rate increases back in view. He said crude prices around US$100, if sustained, could lift inflation from its current 3 per cent.

The bank’s central concern is whether inflation will move back toward its 2 per cent target without higher rates. Macklem cited Brent crude trading around US$110 and West Texas Intermediate near US$101. Those prices are above the level at which he said inflation could gradually rise.

In an account published by The Globe and Mail, he said the bank will assess whether inflation can return to target on its own or whether rate increases may be required to steer it there. The report also said the bank has held its benchmark rate at 2.25 per cent for seven consecutive decisions.

The expected forecast revision reflects a changed oil-price outlook, while the decision on rates remains conditional. The Globe and Mail reported that the bank is weighing inflation against economic growth risks associated with the trade war with the United States.

Tekedia likewise described higher oil and petroleum-product prices as increasing the risk of broader and more sustained price pressures, and said rate increases are in focus ahead of the October 28 policy decision. The accounts do not give a single shared view of market pricing for that decision.

The Globe and Mail said markets saw about a 35 per cent chance of a quarter-point increase on October 28, rising to 95 per cent for the December 9 decision. Tekedia, citing market expectations, said investors were not pricing in a rate change at either the October meeting or the bank’s final policy decision of the year.

These descriptions are incompatible assessments of expectations for the same decisions; neither establishes what the Bank of Canada will decide. The Australian coverage offers a related example of how energy prices can complicate inflation forecasts, but it concerns a different central bank and economy.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported that the Reserve Bank of Australia built its forecasts on oil prices up to US$20 per barrel below recent levels and plans to update them next month. It also said Australian inflation rose 0.4 per cent in August and would have fallen without higher petrol prices.

The Australian bank is weighing rate increases against slower growth and possible job losses. The Canadian bank’s next decision is scheduled for October 28, according to the reports, but Macklem’s comments describe an assessment still underway rather than a commitment to raise rates.

The October decision will depend on more than oil’s immediate effect on inflation, Tekedia reported. The central bank must judge whether the price pressure will persist and whether inflation can return to target without further tightening. For households and businesses in Canada, the stakes are the competing effects of higher inflation and potentially higher borrowing costs.

Macklem’s account links sustained oil near US$100 to inflation drifting above 3 per cent, while the bank is also considering economic growth risks. The coming policy choice therefore turns on the persistence of energy-driven price pressure and its balance against growth, not on the forecast revision alone.

Why it matters

  • Canadian households face the prospect of inflation rising from its current 3 per cent if oil stays near US$100, according to Macklem.
  • Canadian borrowers could face higher interest rates if the Bank of Canada concludes inflation will not return to its 2 per cent target on its own.
  • The Bank of Canada is balancing inflation risks against economic growth risks linked to the trade war with the United States.
  • The Australian comparison shows a distinct policy trade-off: the Reserve Bank of Australia is weighing higher rates against slower growth and possible job losses.

What to watch next

  • Whether the Bank of Canada changes its inflation forecast this month, as Macklem said it expects to do.
  • The Bank of Canada’s October 28 policy decision and whether it raises the benchmark rate.
  • Whether the Bank of Canada’s December 9 decision includes a rate increase, which the Globe and Mail reported markets had assigned a 95 per cent probability.
  • Whether the Reserve Bank of Australia updates its forecasts next month to account for higher oil prices.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
4 source articles · 4 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Too few rated· 2 Center · 2 unrated
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 50% · Asia 25% · Other 25%
Outlet political mix
Too few rated
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
2 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 2 unrated outlets are not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
4 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

1 factual disagreement · 2 framing differences · 2 uncorroborated claims · 3 information gaps
Sources disagree on one factual point.Compared across 3 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 1 other outlet was checked by headline only.
Factual disagreements
Sources report different numbers, dates, attribution or causes for the same thing.
  • For expectations about a rate change at the October 28 and December decisions, The Globe and Mail reports probabilities of roughly 35 per cent and 95 per cent, while Tekedia says investors were not pricing in a change at either decision.
Updat3: The evidence conflicts; Updat3 does not present either version as established.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • The Globe and Mail foregrounds Macklem’s assessment of oil prices and the Bank of Canada’s inflation outlook; Tekedia emphasizes the prospect of broader, more persistent price pressure and the October policy decision.
  • The Sydney Morning Herald covers Australia’s Reserve Bank and inflation pressures as a comparison, not as a report about the Bank of Canada.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • Macklem said sustained oil prices around US$100 could make inflation drift up from its current 3 per cent.
  • Tekedia says the October 28 decision will depend on more than the immediate inflation effect of higher crude prices.
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The sources do not provide a Canadian household or business cost estimate for the projected oil-related inflation pressure.
  • The sources do not report a Bank of Canada decision to change interest rates; the rate decision remains pending.
  • The Globe and Mail says markets saw about a 35 per cent chance of a quarter-point increase on October 28 and 95 per cent for December 9; Tekedia says investors were not pricing in a change at either meeting.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. In 1979, the Iranian Revolution disrupted oil production and contributed to another major price shock.
    Background · from our historical context
  2. Tiff Macklem was appointed Governor of the Bank of Canada.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. The energy-market backdrop changed on February 28, 2026, when the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iranian power plants, air defences and military infrastructure.
    Background · from our historical context
  4. In August 2026, Australian consumer prices rose 0.4 per cent, and petrol prices offset declines elsewhere in the monthly measure, according to the data cited in contemporaneous reporting.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. The war that began with those strikes was ongoing by October 18, 2026.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

In August 2026, Australian consumer prices rose 0.4 per cent, and petrol prices offset declines elsewhere in the monthly measure, according to the data cited in contemporaneous reporting.

That fuel-price sensitivity has mattered to inflation assessments in both Australia and Canada, where central banks have had to weigh price pressures against the effects of higher interest rates on economic activity.

Original sources

4 articles from 4 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.