Skip to content
Sign in
Technology · Europe

Poland threatens fines as Minister says Platforms aid Russian influence efforts

Poland’s Digital Affairs Minister Krysztof Gawkowski accused social media platforms of failing to curb disinformation and called them allies of Russian influence efforts. He said platforms could face financial penalties if they leave government requests unfulfilled.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 2 independent reports from 4 outlets · Article text read from 1 of 2 reportsHow it's made

View timeline · 5 entries
4 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Center OnlyL 0 · C 3 · R 0 · 1 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Poland
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • Poland says social media firms are allies of Russia; the Reuters and The Straits Times headlines say Poland threatened fines.
  • Polish Digital Affairs Minister Krysztof Gawkowski accused social media platforms of doing too little to curb disinformation (per thenews.com.pk).
  • Poland's NASK National Research Institute reported that platforms ignored requests concerning more than 65,000 reports of fake news and disinformation in the first half of 2026 (per thenews.com.pk).

The brief

Poland’s Digital Affairs Minister Krysztof Gawkowski accused social media platforms of failing to curb disinformation and warned that non-compliance could bring financial penalties.

In remarks reported by The News, he called the platforms “a silent ally to the Russian bots and the Kremlin’s GRU.” Reuters and The Straits Times also reported in their headlines that Poland had threatened fines against social media firms.

The News said data from Poland’s NASK National Research Institute showed that platforms ignored requests concerning more than 65,000 reports of fake news and disinformation in the first half of 2026. The account does not specify how many requests went to each company or how many distinct posts or accounts the reports involved.

The same account said platforms deleted 7% of reported fake-account and disinformation cases, while moderation action was taken on slightly more than 17%. It does not describe what counted as a deletion versus another moderation measure, so those figures should be read as separate reported outcomes rather than a complete breakdown of the cases.

Gawkowski said companies would face fines for non-compliance. He also described a possible enforcement step: an unfulfilled government request, he said, would trigger proceedings to impose financial penalties. His statement presents that as a mechanism that could be used; it does not say that a proceeding has already begun.

The government’s allegation about the platforms accompanies Poland’s broader position, which The News said is shared by other western countries: Russian propaganda and disinformation are responsible for inciting divisions in societies. That is an attributed government position, rather than an independently established finding in the account.

The figures and warning put the focus on how platforms handle reports and how the Polish government may enforce requests. The account does not name a company, identify a specific government request, state a fine amount, or report a response from the social media firms.

Any next step described by Gawkowski would depend on an unfulfilled state request and proceedings to impose a penalty.

Why it matters

  • Polish authorities say platform handling of reports is inadequate: NASK data cited by The News says requests concerning more than 65,000 reports were ignored in the first half of 2026.
  • The figures distinguish between reported cases deleted (7%) and those receiving other moderation action (slightly more than 17%), measures that could shape scrutiny of platforms’ handling of disinformation reports.
  • Gawkowski identified financial penalties as the enforcement mechanism for non-compliance, with proceedings potentially triggered by an unfulfilled state request.

What to watch next

  • Whether the Polish government makes a request that social media firms leave unfulfilled.
  • Whether Polish authorities begin proceedings to impose financial penalties, the mechanism Gawkowski described.
  • Whether social media firms respond to Gawkowski’s accusations or the threatened fines.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 4 unique outlets · 2 distinct reports
Outlet political mix: Center Only· 3 Center · 1 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Asia 50% · Europe 25% · Other 25%
Outlet political mix
Center Only
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
3 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
4 unique outletsDominant coverage: Asia
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (3 of 3 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How we measure coverage

One source is from a wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP or Bloomberg), whose reporting other outlets often republish.

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. The EU adopted the Digital Services Act (DSA) in 2022, creating binding duties for online platforms, including systems to assess and mitigate specified risks.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. The European Commission began enforcing the DSA against the largest platforms in August 2023; the law allows fines of up to 6% of a company’s worldwide annual turnover for non-compliance.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. The Digital Services Act became applicable to online platforms across the EU.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

In October 2018, the European Commission introduced a voluntary Code of Practice on Disinformation, asking online platforms to improve transparency and curb fake accounts and political advertising; it relied on companies’ commitments rather than fines.

Russia’s February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine sharpened Poland’s concern about disinformation linked to Russia, but the existence of that concern does not by itself establish that any particular post or platform action was directed by the Russian government.

Original sources

5 articles from 4 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.