Skip to content
Technology · Asia Pacific

Ride On Express says unauthorized access may have exposed about 6.5 million customers

Ride On Express Holdings said unauthorized server access may have compromised the personal information of up to about 6.5 million registered customers. The company said it has suspended orders through its websites and apps since last Wednesday while it investigates and that credit card information was not stored or exposed.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 2 outlets' reporting · Full text read from 1 of 2 outletsHow it's made

2 outletsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Too few ratedL 0 · C 2 · R 0
Updat3 graphic: Ride On Express Holdings
Updat3 graphic

What happened

Key facts

  • Ride On Express Holdings said unauthorized server access may have compromised personal data for up to about 6.5 million registered customers (per The Japan Times).
  • Ride On Express Holdings operates the Gin no Sara, Sushi Joto and Kamatora delivery services, whose users were affected (per The Japan Times).
  • Central Japan Railway (JR Central) said about 15,000 users of its e-commerce website may have had names, addresses and email addresses leaked due to fraudulent access at IDC Frontier (per The Japan Times).

The brief

Ride On Express Holdings has disclosed that unauthorized access to its servers may have put the personal information of roughly 6.5 million registered customers at risk.

The company said the data potentially exposed includes names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth and encrypted passwords linked to users of its Gin no Sara, Sushi Joto and Kamatora delivery services. Ride On Express told customers it does not retain credit card information and that payment card data was not compromised.

The firm also said it has suspended taking orders through its websites and mobile apps since last Wednesday while it investigates the incident, and that it publicly disclosed the breach on Tuesday.

The company’s disclosure did not list a confirmed number of accounts actually accessed; instead it reported an upper estimate of about 6.5 million registered customers whose personal data may have been exposed.

The affected fields cited in Ride On Express’s statement included basic identity and contact details and encrypted passwords for accounts on its official digital platforms. Ride On Express operates multiple branded delivery services in Japan, and the company named Gin no Sara, Sushi Joto and Kamatora as those whose users were affected.

The firm framed the incident as resulting from unauthorized server access and said it is investigating the scope of the intrusion while keeping order-taking on its online channels suspended.

Separately, Central Japan Railway (JR Central) reported that about 15,000 users of its e-commerce website may have had names, addresses and email addresses leaked following fraudulent access at IDC Frontier, a cloud services unit of SoftBank; JR Central said credit card information was not affected.

The finance-focused headline from BigGo Finance likewise reported that ordering remained suspended and that up to 6.5 million customer records may have been leaked at the Gin no Sara delivery chain.

Ride On Express’s statement gave the types of data potentially exposed and the brands affected but did not provide further details on how the unauthorized access occurred, whether specific accounts have been confirmed as accessed, or what remedial steps beyond suspending online orders the company had taken at the time of the disclosure.

Why it matters

  • Customers of Ride On Express’s Gin no Sara, Sushi Joto and Kamatora services face concrete risk to their personal contact and identity data—names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses and dates of birth—for roughly 6.5 million registered accounts.
  • Encrypted passwords were among the fields reported exposed, creating a mechanism by which account takeover or credential-stuffing attacks could target affected users unless they change reused passwords.
  • Ride On Express’s suspension of online ordering affects users who rely on its websites and apps to place delivery orders and signals an operational disruption while the company investigates.

What to watch next

  • Whether Ride On Express publishes a verified count of accounts actually accessed and details of which data fields were confirmed exposed.
  • Whether Ride On Express resumes taking orders through its websites and apps and what safeguards it implements before restoring service.
  • Whether Ride On Express notifies affected customers directly and issues guidance on password resets or credit-monitoring measures.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
2 source articles · 2 unique outlets
Coverage mix: Too few rated· 2 Center
Where the outlets are based: Asia 100%
Coverage mix
Too few rated
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
2 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
2 unique outletsDominant coverage: Asia
Limited coverage
  • Coverage is currently limited to 2 outlets.
How we measure coverage

One source is from a wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP or Bloomberg), whose reporting other outlets often republish.

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

How we got here

Immediate backdrop: Japan’s revised Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI), overhauled by legislation adopted in 2015 and taking effect in 2017, set stricter rules for handling consumer data and laid groundwork for later mandatory notification requirements.

Structural roots: a further APPI amendment passed in 2020 and made enforceable in 2022 introduced explicit breach-notification duties and expanded extraterritorial rules, and the Personal Information Protection Commission (established by law in 2016) was given enforcement authority.

Original sources

2 articles from 2 outlets · Asia · Show all

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.