Skip to content
Sign in
Technology · North America

Musk's companies study a $3.5 trillion SpaceX-Tesla merger

Elon Musk said SpaceX and Tesla formed special committees to examine combining the companies. The proposed deal is valued at about $3.5 trillion and, if completed, would be the largest corporate transaction in history.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 6 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 2 of 6 outlets · short excerpt from 1 more · 1 article captured only in partHow it's made

View timeline · 10 entries
This story was corrected on Oct 23, 2026 following an editorial review.
6 outlets3 regionsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Center OnlyL 0 · C 6 · R 0
File photo
Photo: NASA/SpaceX / Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • Elon Musk said SpaceX and Tesla formed special committees to study a merger.
  • The proposed combination is valued at about $3.5 trillion.
  • The merger would be the largest corporate deal in history.
  • The report says most analysts expect the merger to happen.
  • The article links the proposal’s appeal partly to views on Elon Musk’s stated ambition to go to Mars.
  • The article says SpaceX is about to borrow another $40 billion to buy Nvidia chips.

The brief

Elon Musk said SpaceX and Tesla have formed special committees to examine combining the companies in a deal valued at about $3.5 trillion. If completed, the transaction would be the largest corporate deal in history, according to The Japan Times. The reports describe a proposal under consideration, not a completed merger.

Musk said during SpaceX’s third-quarter earnings call that he could not participate in the committees’ discussions because he had a conflict of interest. He described the arrangement as separate groups holding talks without him in the room. Musk said the committee members were independent directors but did not identify them.

Tesla’s October 19 proxy filing listed seven independent directors under Nasdaq’s listing standards: board chair Robyn Denholm, Ira Ehrenpreis, former chief technology officer JB Straubel, Joe Gebbia, Jack Hartung, James Murdoch and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson.

The filing’s list offers possible context for committee membership, but Musk did not say which directors serve on either committee.

The Verge emphasizes the personal and strategic questions behind the proposed combination, saying the merger’s appeal depends partly on how readers assess Musk’s stated ambition to go to Mars and “spread the light of consciousness.” Musk made that remark during SpaceX’s earnings call.

The outlet also points to incentives in his pay package as relevant to how the proposal is viewed.

The Verge’s account includes SpaceX financial figures from the same earnings period: it reported $7.56 billion in revenue from what the article calls its artificial-intelligence division, then corrects that description to “super intelligence.” The outlet says a subcategory called “SI solutions & infrastructure revenues” reached $7 billion, more than three times its level in the prior quarter.

It attributes an estimate about the sources of that revenue to Gil Luria, an analyst at DA Davidson, who said most of the remainder likely came from computing services for Anthropic and Google, with Grok contributing less. The potential combination also sits alongside a collaboration that has not been fully defined.

The Verge quotes SpaceX’s May S-1 as saying Terafab and Microhard were at an early stage and that SpaceX and Tesla had not settled details including financial terms, intellectual-property rights and the collaboration’s duration. Those unresolved terms concern the collaboration, not a confirmed merger agreement.

For now, the central developments are the committees’ examination of a possible transaction and Musk’s stated exclusion from their discussions. The reported valuation and potential historic scale describe the proposal’s stakes; the sources do not say that either company has approved or completed a merger.

Why it matters

  • Tesla shareholders face a proposed combination valued at about $3.5 trillion, while the independent committees are meant to examine it without Musk participating in their discussions.
  • Musk’s personal financial incentives are part of the scrutiny: The Verge says his pay-package incentives bear on how the proposal is viewed, while the committee process is described as independent of his participation.
  • SpaceX reported $7.56 billion in third-quarter revenue from its artificial-intelligence division, which The Verge says it corrected to “super intelligence”; the outlet also reported $7 billion in SI solutions and infrastructure revenue.
  • SpaceX and Tesla’s Terafab and Microhard collaboration still had unsettled financial terms, intellectual-property rights and duration in the May S-1 account cited by The Verge.

What to watch next

  • Whether SpaceX and Tesla’s special committees identify their members or reach a decision on the proposed combination.
  • Whether Musk remains excluded from committee discussions on the grounds he described as a conflict of interest.
  • Whether the companies settle the financial terms, intellectual-property rights and duration of their Terafab and Microhard collaboration.
  • Whether SpaceX and Tesla approve or complete a merger valued at about $3.5 trillion.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
6 source articles · 6 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Center Only· 6 Center
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 50% · Europe 17% · Other 33%
Outlet political mix
Center Only
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
6 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
6 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (6 of 6 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
How we measure coverage

2 sources are from a wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP or Bloomberg), whose reporting other outlets often republish.

How outlets' accounts compare

4 framing differences · 2 uncorroborated claims · 2 information gaps
The reports repeat the same account with different emphasis; its central claims are not independently confirmed in the reporting Updat3 read.Compared across 2 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 4 other outlets were checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • The Japan Times foregrounds the proposed $3.5 trillion valuation and the possibility of a record-setting corporate transaction; The Verge focuses on Musk’s Mars ambitions, pay incentives and the proposal’s appeal to readers.
  • TechCrunch gives detail on Musk’s stated exclusion from committee discussions and Tesla’s independent directors, while The Verge centers its discussion on the merger’s broader appeal and SpaceX business figures.
  • Musk described himself as conflicted and said he could not join committee discussions; the sources do not independently assess that characterization.
  • Musk said the committee members were independent directors but did not identify them; TechCrunch reports that Tesla has seven independent directors, without establishing which of them sit on the committees.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • Musk called the committee arrangement an “odd kabuki dance,” saying two groups were talking while he could not join the conversation.
  • Musk said he wanted to go to Mars and “spread the light of consciousness,” as reported by The Verge.
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The sources do not explain how the approximately $3.5 trillion valuation was calculated.
  • The sources do not provide a merger agreement, approval schedule or details of how a combined company would be governed.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. (SpaceX) was founded by Musk in 2002 to develop space transportation, including eventual missions to Mars.
    Background · from our historical context
  2. Elon Musk joined Tesla as an early investor and board chairman.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. Elon Musk became Tesla’s chief executive.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. Tesla proposed acquiring SolarCity, whose chairman was Elon Musk.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  5. Tesla shareholders approved the company’s acquisition of SolarCity.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  6. Tesla shareholders approved a compensation package for Elon Musk.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  7. A Delaware court ruled that Elon Musk had not breached his fiduciary duties in Tesla’s SolarCity acquisition and found its price fair.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  8. A Delaware court voided Elon Musk’s Tesla compensation package.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  9. A Delaware court rejected Tesla’s effort to reverse its ruling voiding Elon Musk’s compensation package.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  10. Tesla announced an investment of about $2 billion to acquire shares in an AI startup that was a SpaceX subsidiary.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

Tesla’s earlier major transaction involving another Musk company was its 2016 acquisition of SolarCity, a solar-energy company chaired by Musk. Tesla shareholders approved the deal in November 2016; in 2022, a Delaware judge ruled that Musk had not controlled the transaction’s terms and dismissed a shareholder lawsuit seeking to unwind it.

Tesla shareholders approved his 2018 pay package, valued at about $56 billion when challenged, but on January 30, 2024, Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick voided it, finding that Musk had exercised control over the process.

Original sources

6 articles from 6 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.