Skip to content
Sign in
Technology · North America

MRC says Apple News gave Republican priorities 84 negative stories and none positive

The Media Research Center says Apple News promoted 84 stories that framed Republican priorities negatively and none that framed them positively. Its report counted 117 stories on Republican-aligned issues, including 33 with neutral headlines.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 4 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 2 of 4 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 6 entries
4 outletsLatest reporting 2 min read
Coverage: Mostly RightL 0 · C 1 · R 2 · 1 unrated
Updat3 graphic: MRC
Updat3 graphic

What happened

Key facts

  • The Media Research Center said Apple News promoted 84 negative stories about Republican priorities and no positive ones (per dailymail.com, Breitbart).
  • The Media Research Center said Republican voters relying on Apple News saw about five stories per day that negatively portrayed the party’s top ten policy priorities (per Breitbart).
  • The priorities named in the report included immigration, law and order, and drug enforcement (per Breitbart).
  • Media Research Center President David Bozell said Apple News ran 84 negative headlines on Republican priorities and none that were positive (per Breitbart, dailymail.com).
  • David Bozell asked Apple to explain who selects the stories and why Republican priorities received negative coverage (per Breitbart, dailymail.com).

The brief

The Media Research Center says Apple News promoted 84 stories that negatively framed Republican priorities and none that portrayed those priorities positively. The study’s tally, as described by the Daily Mail, included 117 stories about Republican-aligned issues: 84 with negative framing and 33 with neutral headlines.

The two accounts place the study’s review period from September 15 through September 30. Breitbart reports that the Media Research Center examined Apple News’s top 20 stories, while the Daily Mail describes an analysis of the top stories pushed by the platform.

Both accounts report the central count of 84 negative stories and zero positive ones; the Daily Mail additionally gives the total of 117 and the neutral count. Breitbart says the Media Research Center estimated that Republican voters who use Apple News encountered about five negatively framed stories per day concerning the party’s ten leading policy priorities.

It identifies immigration, law and order, and drug enforcement among those issues. That daily estimate is the study’s characterization of exposure, not a separate count of individual voters or their reading habits. Media Research Center President David Bozell said Apple News ran 84 negative headlines and no positive ones on Republican priorities.

He urged Apple to explain who chooses the stories and why, using a metaphor comparing the selection to a bartender watering down only one party’s drinks. His remarks present the study as evidence of an imbalance in how the app covers the party’s policy agenda.

The Daily Mail situates the coverage in the lead-up to the U.S. midterm elections, reporting that voters were due to vote on November 3 and that polls showed Republicans expected to struggle. The study’s subject is therefore tied to a campaign period in which news presentation of party priorities was under scrutiny.

The sources do not provide the underlying story list, a measure of Apple News users’ exposure, or an account from Apple explaining its editorial selection. The reported counts describe the Media Research Center’s analysis, rather than an independently verified audit of Apple News.

The Daily Mail and Breitbart both relay the study’s central result, while Breitbart adds Bozell’s comments and the report’s estimate of daily exposure. Newsbusters and Yahoo also published headlines reporting the 84-to-zero finding; those headlines add no further detail about the study’s methods or Apple’s position.

Why it matters

  • The Media Research Center’s account raises a concrete information-exposure question for Republican voters using Apple News: it estimates about five negatively framed stories per day on the party’s ten leading priorities.
  • The study counted 84 negative and 33 neutral stories among 117 stories on Republican-aligned issues, while finding none with positive framing; those categories shape the specific imbalance the report alleges.
  • Immigration, law and order, and drug enforcement are among the priorities named, so the reported framing concerns subjects central to the party’s policy agenda.
  • The report appeared in the lead-up to the November 3 midterm vote, when voters were preparing to choose candidates; the sources do not establish that the coverage changed views or voting choices.

What to watch next

  • Whether Apple explains who selects the stories and why, as Media Research Center President David Bozell requested.
  • Whether the Media Research Center’s underlying list of the 117 stories becomes available for scrutiny.
  • Whether Apple News coverage of Republican-aligned issues continues to show the same negative, neutral, and positive distribution in later periods.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 4 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Mostly Right· 1 Center · 2 Right · 1 unrated
Where the outlets are based: US/Canada 75% · Unknown 25%
Outlet political mix
Mostly Right
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
1 outlet
2 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
4 unique outletsDominant coverage: US/Canada
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among outlets based in US/Canada (3 of 4 geographically-identified sources).
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

2 framing differences · 1 uncorroborated claim · 2 information gaps
The reports repeat the same account with different emphasis; its central claims are not independently confirmed in the reporting Updat3 read.Compared across 2 reports whose article text Updat3 read; 2 other outlets were checked by headline only.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources emphasise different angles, actors or consequences of the same reporting.
  • The Daily Mail emphasizes the election setting and reports the 117-story total, including 33 neutral headlines; Breitbart emphasizes the estimate of about five negative stories per day and quotes David Bozell criticizing Apple’s selection.
  • The 84-to-zero finding is attributed to the Media Research Center; Bozell’s criticism and request for an explanation are his stated views.
Updat3: These are differences of emphasis, not disputes about what is reported. They do not show that the reported claims are true.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • David Bozell compared the app’s selection to a bartender watering down only one party’s drinks and asked Apple to explain who chooses the stories and why.
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • The sources do not identify the individual stories included in the count, explain the criteria used to classify headlines, or report Apple’s account of its editorial selection.
  • The sources do not provide the underlying story list or independent verification of the Media Research Center’s coding and daily-exposure estimate.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. The Media Research Center, whose later assessment focused on political coverage in the app, was founded in 1987 by L. Brent Bozell III to monitor what it described as liberal bias in U.S. news media.
    Background · from our historical context
  2. The Media Research Center founded CNSNews.com.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. The Media Research Center launched the NewsBusters blog.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. Apple News’ editorial-curation model dates to its launch on June 30, 2015, when Apple introduced an app that combined publisher feeds with stories selected by editors.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. Apple announced it had acquired the digital magazine service Texture.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  6. Apple expanded the service on March 25, 2019, with Apple News+, a subscription offering access to participating magazines and newspapers; the free app’s curated news feed remained distinct from that paid catalog.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

Apple News’ editorial-curation model dates to its launch on June 30, 2015, when Apple introduced an app that combined publisher feeds with stories selected by editors. Apple expanded the service on March 25, 2019, with Apple News+, a subscription offering access to participating magazines and newspapers; the free app’s curated news feed remained distinct from that paid catalog.

The Media Research Center, whose later assessment focused on political coverage in the app, was founded in 1987 by L. Brent Bozell III to monitor what it described as liberal bias in U.S. news media.

Original sources

5 articles from 4 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.