Skip to content
Sign in
Politics · Europe

The Atlantic says CIA operations supporting Ukraine remain active

The Atlantic reported that the CIA continues assisting Ukraine and that an intelligence official based in the Baltic states described its operations as more aggressive than during Joe Biden’s administration. The outlet also reported that Donald Trump threatened to end intelligence support unless Ukraine stopped attacking Russian oil refineries.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 4 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 1 of 4 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 7 entries
4 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: MixedL 1 · C 1 · R 1 · 1 unrated
Updat3 graphic: Ukraine
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • An intelligence official based in the Baltic states told The Atlantic that CIA operations are more aggressive than during Joe Biden’s administration (per interfax.com.ua).
  • The official said the change in CIA operations would not be apparent from Donald Trump’s rhetoric (per interfax.com.ua).
  • The Atlantic reported that Donald Trump threatened to end intelligence support unless Ukraine stopped attacking Russian oil refineries (per interfax.com.ua).
  • The Atlantic reported that the CIA director would not dissuade Donald Trump if he decided to cut off intelligence to Ukraine (per pravda.com.ua, interfax.com.ua).

The brief

The Atlantic reported that the CIA continues to assist Ukraine and that its operations are more aggressive than they were under Joe Biden, citing an intelligence official based in the Baltic states. The official said the intelligence work is not apparent from Donald Trump’s public rhetoric.

The official works closely with the United States to counter Russian influence, according to The Atlantic. The outlet’s account describes continuing CIA activity while also reporting that Trump threatened to end intelligence support unless Ukraine stopped attacking Russian oil refineries.

The report does not identify when that threat was made or provide further details about the intelligence operations. A headline from The New Voice of Ukraine likewise says the CIA continues sharing intelligence with Ukraine despite tensions between Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

The headline confirms that framing but provides no additional detail about the assistance or the relationship between the two leaders. Ukrainska Pravda’s headline attributes to The Atlantic a separate claim about the CIA director: that the director would not try to dissuade Trump if he decided to cut off intelligence to Ukraine.

That is a conditional account of what the director would do if Trump made such a decision, not a report that intelligence support has been cut off.

The Atlantic’s headline describes its story as examining a figure at the center of Trump’s “Deeply Conflicted Ukraine Policy.” The headlines identify the CIA director as relevant to the question of a possible cutoff, but the article excerpt does not name that official. It also does not say whether Trump’s reported threat led to any change in intelligence sharing.

The account therefore presents two elements of the policy: continued CIA assistance, including operations the Baltic-based official characterized as more aggressive than under the previous administration, and Trump’s reported threat to end support if Ukraine did not stop attacks on Russian oil refineries.

The available details do not specify the assistance’s scope, the timing of the threat, or any subsequent decision by Trump or the CIA director.

Why it matters

  • Ukraine is the population directly affected by the reported intelligence support; The Atlantic says Trump threatened to end it if Ukraine did not stop attacking Russian oil refineries.
  • The CIA’s ongoing assistance and the reported threat to end intelligence support describe competing policy directions, while the Baltic-based official characterized current operations as more aggressive than under Joe Biden’s administration.
  • The reported condition in Trump’s threat links intelligence support to Ukraine’s attacks on Russian oil refineries.

What to watch next

  • Whether Donald Trump decides to end intelligence support to Ukraine, as described in The Atlantic’s reported threat.
  • Whether the CIA director would seek to dissuade Trump if he decided to cut off support, as stated in the Ukrainska Pravda headline.
  • Whether CIA intelligence sharing with Ukraine continues, as reported by The Atlantic and stated in The New Voice of Ukraine headline.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 4 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Mixed· 1 Left · 1 Center · 1 Right · 1 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Europe 50% · US/Canada 25% · Other 25%
Outlet political mix
Mixed
Left
Center
Right
1 outlet
1 outlet
1 outlet
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
4 unique outletsDominant coverage: Europe
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. The CIA’s relationship with Ukrainian intelligence agencies deepened after Russia seized and annexed Crimea in 2014 and fighting began in the Donbas.
    Background · from our historical context
  2. Russia launched its full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022; the United States and other governments subsequently supplied Ukraine with military, economic and intelligence assistance.
    Background · from our historical context
  3. Donald Trump won the presidency, and Republicans gained control of the Senate.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. Donald Trump was inaugurated for a second, non-consecutive term as U.S. president.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  5. Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky met at the White House; their planned minerals agreement was not signed.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  6. The Trump administration paused intelligence sharing and military aid to Ukraine.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  7. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin discussed a proposed pause in attacks on energy infrastructure during a phone call.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3

How we got here

The CIA’s relationship with Ukrainian intelligence agencies deepened after Russia seized and annexed Crimea in 2014 and fighting began in the Donbas. Public accounts of that partnership describe a gradual expansion of U.S. intelligence cooperation over the years that followed, as Ukraine sought to strengthen its security institutions and the United States provided assistance.

Russia’s full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022, brought intelligence support into the center of U.S. policy: during the invasion, the Biden administration shared intelligence intended to help Ukraine anticipate Russian military moves and defend itself.

Original sources

5 articles from 4 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.