Skip to content
Sign in
Energy · Global

Former Polar Train LNG chief says Novatek controlled US venture

Former Polar Train LNG chief executive Riddle told the Financial Times that Novatek financed the venture and controlled its strategic direction. The account says senior executives resigned from the $25 billion project after Riddle raised those allegations.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 4 outlets' reporting · Article text read from 1 of 4 outletsHow it's made

View timeline · 7 entries
4 outletsLatest reporting 3 min read
Coverage: Too few ratedL 0 · C 2 · R 0 · 2 unrated
Updat3 graphic: United States
Updat3 graphic · Map data: Natural Earth Natural Earth (public domain)

What happened

Key facts

  • The Financial Times reported that US executives quit a $25 billion gas venture over claims of secret Russian control (per slguardian.org, Financial Times).
  • Riddle said he resigned as chief executive because he was uncomfortable with Novatek financing the company and ultimately controlling its strategic direction (per slguardian.org).
  • According to people familiar with the discussions, a proposed US-Russia arrangement would have Novatek contribute expertise to an Alaska facility in exchange for sanctions relief for Arctic LNG 2 (per slguardian.org).
  • Traders Union described the Alaska project as facing sanctions-risk claims over alleged Novatek control (per tradersunion.com, slguardian.org).
  • Riddle told the Financial Times that he later became aware Novatek was supplying the capital (per slguardian.org).

The brief

The former chief executive of Polar Train LNG alleged that Russia’s Novatek financed the US venture and controlled its strategic direction, according to slguardian.org’s account of his interview with the Financial Times. The account says senior executives resigned from the $25 billion liquefied natural gas project after the allegations surfaced.

The Financial Times headline also describes US executives quitting over claims of secret Russian control. Riddle said he left his chief executive role because he was uncomfortable with Novatek financing the company and ultimately directing its strategy. He told the Financial Times that he later became aware Novatek was supplying the capital.

The slguardian.org account does not identify when he learned this or when he resigned. Riddle argued that a project with strategic importance to the United States should rely on American technology and investment from US investors.

His account places the question of who provided the venture’s funding alongside who shaped its strategic direction; it does not provide a response from Novatek or the project. The proposed arrangement described by people familiar with discussions would have Novatek contribute expertise to an Alaska facility in exchange for sanctions relief for Arctic LNG 2.

The source characterizes that arrangement as a proposal, not a completed agreement. It does not say whether the proposed exchange received approval or proceeded. The project’s size is reported as $25 billion. The headline from SFG Media says nearly all senior executives at the American gas project in Alaska resigned, while slguardian.org says senior executives resigned.

The Financial Times headline likewise reports US executives quitting, but does not specify a number in its headline. Traders Union’s headline frames the matter as sanctions-risk claims linked to alleged Novatek control of the Alaska project.

The slguardian.org account says the allegation concerned financing and strategic direction before US sanctions approval, while the proposed arrangement tied Novatek’s expertise to sanctions relief for Arctic LNG 2. These claims and the proposed terms are attributed accounts; the source does not establish that Novatek’s control or the exchange was formally determined.

Why it matters

  • The proposed arrangement linked Novatek’s expertise for an Alaska facility with sanctions relief for Arctic LNG 2, according to people familiar with the discussions.
  • Riddle’s stated concern focused on Novatek supplying the venture’s capital and controlling its strategic direction.
  • Riddle said a project of strategic importance to the United States should use American technology and funding from US investors.

What to watch next

  • Whether Novatek or the Polar Train LNG project addresses Riddle’s allegations about financing and strategic direction.
  • Whether the proposed Novatek expertise-for-sanctions-relief arrangement involving the Alaska facility and Arctic LNG 2 proceeds.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
4 source articles · 4 unique outlets
Outlet political mix: Too few rated· 2 Center · 2 unrated
Where the outlets are based: Unknown 50% · Europe 25% · Other 25%
Outlet political mix
Too few rated
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
2 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 2 unrated outlets are not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
4 unique outletsDominant coverage: Europe
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

Updat3 does not yet have enough full reports to compare how outlets framed this story.

Timeline

Developments from this story's sources, dated background we compiled and fact-checked, and our earlier coverage. Each row says which.
  1. The Alaska Gasline Development Corporation joined ExxonMobil, BP, ConocoPhillips and TransCanada in advancing an Alaska gas pipeline and LNG export plan.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  2. The Alaska project partners completed preliminary engineering work for the proposed pipeline and LNG export facility.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  3. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued a final environmental impact statement for the Alaska LNG project.
    Background · compiled and fact-checked by Updat3
  4. The sanctions landscape changed after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
    Background · from our historical context
  5. On March 2, 2022, President Joe Biden issued Executive Order 14066, prohibiting certain imports of Russian energy products into the United States.
    Background · from our historical context
  6. On November 2, 2023, the Treasury Department imposed sanctions on Arctic LNG 2, Novatek’s major liquefied-natural-gas project in Russia, and related entities.
    Background · from our historical context
  7. In December 2023, the United States announced sanctions on vessels involved in transporting Arctic LNG 2 cargoes.
    Background · from our historical context

How we got here

Before the Alaska LNG project became the focus of proposals involving Russian expertise, it had already spent years moving between state-led planning and attempts to attract private investment.

In 2014, the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation, a state-owned entity, joined ExxonMobil, BP, ConocoPhillips and TransCanada in advancing a plan to move North Slope natural gas through a pipeline to a liquefaction and export facility in southern Alaska.

Original sources

4 articles from 4 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.