Skip to content
Technology · Global

Zuckerberg thanks Apple CEO after Meta releases Muse Spark Open weights

Mark Zuckerberg publicly thanked Apple CEO John Ternus on X after Meta released the weights for its Muse Spark Open model. Meta said the 816-billion-parameter model runs well on Apple’s M5 Ultra Mac Studio and can operate across two machines with up to 1TB of unified memory.

AI-assisted synthesis · Based on 5 outlets' reporting · Full text read from 3 of 5 outletsHow it's made

5 outlets2 regionsLatest reporting 4 min read
Coverage: Center OnlyL 0 · C 4 · R 0 · 1 unrated
File photo
Photo: Anurag R Dubey / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

What happened

Key facts

  • Mark Zuckerberg posted on X after Meta released the weights for Muse Spark Open, saying the model "runs great on new Mac Studios."
  • Muse Spark Open is an 816-billion-parameter model built on a mixture-of-experts design.
  • The model is free to download from platforms like Hugging Face and its licence allows commercial use with some limits.

The brief

Mark Zuckerberg publicly thanked Apple CEO John Ternus on X after Meta published the weights for its Muse Spark Open model, and Ternus replied with congratulations and praise for Mac Studio’s on-device AI capability.

Meta described Muse Spark Open as an open-weight, mixture-of-experts model with roughly 816 billion parameters and said it is optimised to run on Apple’s Mac Studio equipped with the M5 Ultra chip.

Meta’s technical description, reflected across the reporting, says the model activates about 42 billion parameters at a time and can run locally when spread across two Mac Studio machines, each configured with up to 512GB of unified memory — a total of 1TB — allowing the full weights to be held and operated on desktop hardware.

Meta also made the weights available for download on platforms including Hugging Face, and one report states the licence allows commercial use with some limits. The companies’ exchange drew notice because it marks a publicly cordial moment between Meta and Apple after years of commercially fraught interactions described in the sources.

Reports recall that Apple’s earlier privacy changes and App Tracking Transparency affected Meta’s advertising business, and that past comments from Apple executives had provoked sharp public responses from Facebook and Meta leadership; the sources present the Zuckerberg–Ternus exchange as a contrast to that history.

Technical and cost details provided in the coverage show practical constraints for running Muse Spark Open on consumer hardware.

Reporters cite Meta’s recommendation that two Mac Studios with M5 Ultra chips and large unified memory configurations are required to operate the model locally; one account gives a retail price benchmark for an M5 Ultra Mac Studio with 256GB of memory and notes the model needs at least two machines.

Meta AI chief Alexandr Wang is quoted in the sources saying Meta lacks control or visibility into users’ Apple hardware setups used to run the model. Outlets vary in emphasis: some foreground the headline exchange between Zuckerberg and Apple’s chief, while others highlight the technical architecture and the claim that the model can run on desktop Apple hardware.

All of the supplied reporting agrees that Meta published the Muse Spark Open weights and described the model as able to run on Mac Studio hardware with M5 Ultra chips, and that Zuckerberg publicly thanked John Ternus with a reciprocal congratulatory reply from Ternus.

The release and the public thanks signal that Meta is making a large-scale model available as open weights and that Apple’s latest desktop silicon is being presented as capable of hosting such models locally.

What is confirmed in the reporting is the publication of the weights, the model specifications Meta released, the stated hardware configuration for local operation and the public exchange between Zuckerberg and Ternus; licensing terms and cost estimates for required hardware are reported but differ in detail across outlets.

This episode illustrates how large AI model releases are being coupled in the sources with attention to on-device performance and distribution choices.

Why it matters

  • Users of high-end Apple Mac Studio hardware face a specific cost barrier: the model requires two Mac Studios with large unified memory configurations (reported as up to 512GB each) to run locally, and one source cites retail pricing that places a 256GB M5 Ultra Mac Studio above Rs 9 lakh at US prices.
  • Software developers and companies seeking to deploy Muse Spark Open commercially can access the released weights on platforms such as Hugging Face under a licence that sources report allows commercial use with limits, creating a documented pathway for third parties to build products using Meta’s model.
  • Meta’s public gratitude toward Apple’s CEO and Apple’s acknowledgment of Mac Studio’s on-device AI capabilities document a shift in the companies’ public interaction that matters to corporate partnerships and engineering integration decisions, as evidenced by the exchanged messages and the emphasis on M5 Ultra compatibility.

What to watch next

  • Whether third-party teams or independent labs publish benchmark results demonstrating Muse Spark Open running on two M5 Ultra Mac Studios configured with up to 512GB unified memory each.
  • Whether additional platforms or repositories beyond Hugging Face host Muse Spark Open weights under the same commercial licence terms reported here.
  • Whether Apple or Meta publish technical notes or optimisation guides detailing how Muse Spark Open was adapted for M5 Ultra Mac Studio performance.
  • Whether commercial products or developer tools announce integrations that use Muse Spark Open under the licence conditions reported by the sources.

How it's being covered

Coverage analysisShow details
5 source articles · 5 unique outlets
Coverage mix: Center Only· 4 Center
Where the outlets are based: Asia 80% · US/Canada 20%
Coverage mix
Center Only
Left
Center
Right
0 outlets
4 outlets
0 outlets
The marker shows coverage balance: each unique outlet counts once. 1 unrated outlet is not included.
Geography
Where the outlets covering this story are based.
5 unique outletsDominant coverage: Asia
Coverage imbalance
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among Center-rated outlets (4 of 4 rated sources); comparatively few Left or Right-rated outlets have published on the event.
  • Coverage is currently concentrated among outlets based in Asia (4 of 5 geographically-identified sources).
How we measure coverage

How outlets' accounts compare

2 factual disagreements · 1 framing difference · 5 uncorroborated claims · 4 information gaps
Sources disagree on 2 factual points.Compared across 3 reports whose full text Updat3 used; 2 other outlets were checked by headline only.
Factual disagreements
Sources report different numbers, dates, attribution or causes for the same thing.
  • India Today describes the model as '800-billion parameters' while The Times of India and fortuneindia.com report '816-billion parameters'.
  • The exact parameter count: sources group the model as '800-billion' and '816-billion'; reporting differs on the precise figure used to describe the model.
Updat3: The evidence conflicts; Updat3 does not present either version as established.
Framing / emphasis differences
Sources agree on the facts but emphasise different angles, actors or consequences.
  • The Times of India and fortuneindia.com frame the story around the technical specs and the model’s 816-billion-parameter scale, while India Today emphasizes the public partnership angle and the remark that the model was 'optimised' for Mac Studio.
Updat3: The underlying facts agree; only the emphasis differs.
One-sided or uncorroborated claims
Claims that come from one party or one source family and are not independently corroborated.
  • The Times of India and fortuneindia.com and India Today attribute the optimisation claim to Meta; Alexandr Wang is named in The Times of India and India Today as saying Meta has no visibility into users’ Apple hardware.
  • Mark Zuckerberg: reported as thanking John Ternus on X after the weights were released.
  • John Ternus: replied 'Congrats to the team!' and wrote Mac Studio 'keeps pushing the boundaries of on-device AI'.
  • Alexandr Wang: said Meta has no control or visibility to the Apple hardware used to run the model.
  • India Today quoted a line, attributed to Wang speaking to Axios, saying 'We're excited for mommy and daddy to be playing nice again.'
Updat3: Not independently corroborated yet — treat as a claim, not an established fact.
Not established by the reporting
Information the available reporting does not contain or confirm. This is a gap, not a disagreement.
  • Sources do not dispute the sequence that Meta published weights and Zuckerberg thanked John Ternus; none of the sources attribute any prior action by Apple as the trigger for Meta releasing the weights.
  • No source supplies independent benchmarks showing Muse Spark Open actually running at scale on the cited M5 Ultra Mac Studio configurations.
  • No source provides detailed, independently verified deployment or sales figures for the Mac Studio hardware used with Muse Spark Open.
  • No source discusses broader licence enforcement mechanisms or how Meta will monitor commercial use under the licence terms it published.
Updat3: Updat3 cannot conclude anything about this from the current sources.

How we got here

Immediate backdrop: Meta had previously released open-weight foundation models, notably LLaMA on February 10, 2023, and Llama 2 on July 18, 2023, both of which Meta distributed with specified licensing terms and public download channels.

Structural roots: the practice of releasing large models with permissive or conditional licences traces to Meta’s July 2023 Llama 2 licence decision and to the broader model-hosting ecosystem centered on Hugging Face (founded 2016), which by 2023 routinely distributed community and corporate model weights.

Original sources

5 articles from 5 outlets

Every story links to the reporting it was built from. How we choose sources

Spotted a factual error, a broken link or a misleading summary? Tell us.